Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30626323›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Evaluation of strategies for the assembly of diverse bacterial genomes using MinION long-read sequencing.

Sarah Goldstein, Lidia Beka, Joerg Graf, Jonathan L Klassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review: Long-Read Sequencing in Algal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah GoldsteinDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Lidia BekaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Joerg GrafDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. joerg.graf@uconn.edu.
Jonathan L KlassenDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. jonathan.klassen@uconn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1745-8838

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 58-1930-4-002Directorate for Biological Sciences IOS-1656475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShort-read sequencing technologies have made microbial genome sequencing cheap and accessible. However, closing genomes is often costly and assembling short reads from genomes that are repetitive and/or have extreme %GC content remains challenging. Long-read, single-molecule sequencing technologies such as the Oxford Nanopore MinION have the potential to overcome these difficulties, although the best approach for harnessing their potential remains poorly evaluated.

resultsWe sequenced nine bacterial genomes spanning a wide range of GC contents using Illumina MiSeq and Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing technologies to determine the advantages of each approach, both individually and combined. Assemblies using only MiSeq reads were highly accurate but lacked contiguity, a deficiency that was partially overcome by adding MinION reads to these assemblies. Even more contiguous genome assemblies were generated by using MinION reads for initial assembly, but these assemblies were more error-prone and required further polishing. This was especially pronounced when Illumina libraries were biased, as was the case for our strains with both high and low GC content. Increased genome contiguity dramatically improved the annotation of insertion sequences and secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters, likely because long-reads can disambiguate these highly repetitive but biologically important genomic regions.

conclusionsGenome assembly using short-reads is challenged by repetitive sequences and extreme GC contents. Our results indicate that these difficulties can be largely overcome by using single-molecule, long-read sequencing technologies such as the Oxford Nanopore MinION. Using MinION reads for assembly followed by polishing with Illumina reads generated the most contiguous genomes with sufficient accuracy to enable the accurate annotation of important but difficult to sequence genomic features such as insertion sequences and secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. The combination of Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing can therefore cost-effectively advance studies of microbial evolution and genome-driven drug discovery.

Indexed as

GenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBase CompositionBiosynthetic PathwaysDNA Transposable ElementsGenome, BacterialMolecular Sequence AnnotationNanoporesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNADNA Transposable ElementsGenome assemblyGenome sequencingInsertion sequencesOxford Nanopore MinIONSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID30626323
PMCPMC6325685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.