Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30626208›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2019

Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Analysis During Chest Compressions to Predict Survival From Cardiac Arrest.

Jason Coult, Jennifer Blackwood, Lawrence Sherman, Thomas D Rea, Peter J Kudenchuk, Heemun Kwok

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Adult advanced life support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  16. [Recent advances in external cardiac defibrillation techniques].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason CoultDepartment of Bioengineering (J.C., L.S.), University of Washington, Seattle.
Jennifer BlackwoodCenter for Progress in Resuscitation (J.C., J.B., L.S., T.D.R., P.J.K., H.K.), University of Washington, Seattle.
Lawrence ShermanDepartment of Bioengineering (J.C., L.S.), University of Washington, Seattle.
Thomas D ReaCenter for Progress in Resuscitation (J.C., J.B., L.S., T.D.R., P.J.K., H.K.), University of Washington, Seattle.
Peter J KudenchukCenter for Progress in Resuscitation (J.C., J.B., L.S., T.D.R., P.J.K., H.K.), University of Washington, Seattle.
Heemun KwokCenter for Progress in Resuscitation (J.C., J.B., L.S., T.D.R., P.J.K., H.K.), University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Bioengineering Cardiovascular Training GrantT32EB001650 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REGNIER, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2019
$3.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative measures of the ventricular fibrillation (VF) ECG waveform can assess myocardial physiology and predict cardiac arrest outcomes, making these measures a candidate to help guide resuscitation. Chest compressions are typically paused for waveform measure calculation because compressions cause ECG artifact. However, such pauses contradict resuscitation guideline recommendations to minimize cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruptions. We evaluated a comprehensive group of VF measures with and without ongoing compressions to determine their performance under both conditions for predicting functionally-intact survival, the study's primary outcome.

methodsFive-second VF ECG segments were collected with and without chest compressions before 2755 defibrillation shocks from 1151 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Twenty-four individual measures and 3 combination measures were implemented. Measures were optimized to predict functionally-intact survival (Cerebral Performance Category score ≤2) using 460 training cases, and their performance evaluated using 691 independent test cases.

resultsMeasures predicted functionally-intact survival on test data with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.56 to 0.75 (median, 0.73) without chest compressions and from 0.53 to 0.75 (median, 0.69) with compressions ( P<0.001 for difference). Of all measures evaluated, the support vector machine model ranked highest both without chest compressions (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.78) and with compressions (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72-0.78; P=0.75 for difference).

conclusionsVF waveform measures predict functionally-intact survival when calculated during chest compressions, but prognostic performance is generally reduced compared with compression-free analysis. However, support vector machine models exhibited similar performance with and without compressions while also achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Such machine learning models may, therefore, offer means to guide resuscitation during uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsElectrocardiographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAgedArtifactsFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsResuscitationRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector Machineartifactcardiopulmonary resuscitationcause of deathsupport vector machineventricular fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID30626208
PMCPMC6532650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.