Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30626077›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Antihistamines for Allergic Rhinitis Treatment from the Viewpoint of Nonsedative Properties.

Hideyuki Kawauchi, Kazuhiko Yanai, De-Yun Wang, Koju Itahashi, Kimihiro Okubo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. [Clinical observation of nasal spray allergen blocker combined with antihistamines in treatment of allergic rhinitis children].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A comment on oral phenylephrine use in sinonasal pathologies.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Twenty-five years: The fexofenadine clinical experience.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024
    Review
  18. Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Single-Domain Antibodies-Novel Tools to Study and Treat Allergies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hideyuki KawauchiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shimane University, Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo-shi, Shimane 693-8501, Japan. kawauchi@med.shimane-u.ac.jp.
Kazuhiko YanaiDepartment of Pharmacology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan. yanai@med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-7907
De-Yun WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore. entwdy@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-0909-2963
Koju ItahashiMedical Science Section, Pharmaceutical R&D Division, Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Kyobashi 2-4-16, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo 104-8002, Japan. kouju.itahashi@meiji.com.
Kimihiro OkuboDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8602, Japan. ent-kimi@nms.ac.jp.
National University of Singapore · SGNippon Medical School · JPShimane University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antihistamines targeting the histamine H₁ receptor play an important role in improving and maintaining the quality of life of patients with allergic rhinitis. For more effective and safer use of second-generation drugs, which are recommended by various guidelines, a classification based on their detailed characteristics is necessary. Antihistamines for first-line therapy should not have central depressant/sedative activities. Sedative properties (drowsiness and impaired performance) are associated with the inhibition of central histamine neurons. Brain H₁ receptor occupancy (H₁RO) is a useful index shown to be correlated with indices based on clinical findings. Antihistamines are classified into non-sedating (<20%), less-sedating (20⁻50%), and sedating (≥50%) groups based on H₁RO. Among the non-sedating group, fexofenadine and bilastine are classified into "non-brain-penetrating antihistamines" based on the H₁RO. These two drugs have many common chemical properties. However, bilastine has more potent binding affinity to the H₁ receptor, and its action tends to last longer. In well-controlled studies using objective indices, bilastine does not affect psychomotor or driving performance even at twice the usual dose (20 mg). Upon selecting antihistamines for allergic rhinitis, various situations should be taken into our consideration. This review summarizes that the non-brain-penetrating antihistamines should be chosen for the first-line therapy of mild allergic rhinitis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHistamine AntagonistsHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatingHumansReceptors, HistamineRhinitis, AllergicHistamine AntagonistsHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatingReceptors, Histamineallergic rhinitisantihistaminebilastinefexofenadineH1 receptor occupancynon-brain-penetrating

Identifiers

PMID30626077
PMCPMC6337346
OpenAlexW2910270552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.