ReviewCells2019
The Potential of Different Origin Stem Cells in Modulating Oral Bone Regeneration Processes.
Review in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Regeneration of periodontal bone defects with mesenchymal stem cells in animal models. Systematic review and meta-analysis.Odontology · 2023Pooled it
- Insights into the role of mesenchymal stem cells in cutaneous medical aesthetics: from basics to clinics.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Oral cavity-derived stem cells and preclinical models of jaw-bone defects for bone tissue engineering.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- microRNAs delivered by small extracellular vesicles in MSCs as an emerging tool for bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Application of dental pulp stem cells in oral maxillofacial tissue engineering.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Review
- Modification of implant surfaces to stimulate mesenchymal cell activation.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2022Review
- Neural crest-like stem cells for tissue regeneration.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Review
- Evidence for AJUBA-catenin-CDH4-linked differentiation resistance of mesenchymal stem cells implies tumorigenesis and progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a single-cell transcriptome approach.Blood and genomics · 2021Article
- Potential of Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Maxillofacial and Periodontal Regeneration: A Narrative Review.International journal of dentistry · 2021Review
- Superior CKIP-1 sensitivity of orofacial bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells in proliferation and osteogenic differentiation compared to long bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- Hydrogels Based Drug Delivery Synthesis, Characterization and Administration.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- Enhancing cell seeding and osteogenesis of MSCs on 3D printed scaffolds through injectable BMP2 immobilized ECM-Mimetic gel.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering has gained much momentum since the implementation of stem cell isolation and manipulation for regenerative purposes. Despite significant technical improvements, researchers still have to decide which strategy (which type of stem cell) is the most suitable for their specific purpose. Therefore, this short review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the three main categories of stem cells: embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells in the context of bone regeneration for dentistry-associated conditions. Importantly, when deciding upon the right strategy, the selection needs to be made in concordance with the morbidity and the life-threatening level of the condition in discussion. Therefore, even when a specific type of stem cell holds several advantages over others, their availability, invasiveness of the collection method and ethical standards become deciding parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.