Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30625983›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Evaluation of Reliability of the Recomputed Nutrient Intake Data in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Twin Study.

Yecheng Yao, Sheng-Bo Chen, Gangqiang Ding, Jun Dai

Abstract readTwin StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yecheng YaoNational Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China. yaoyc@ninh.chinacdc.cn.
Sheng-Bo ChenEducational Technology Doctoral Program, Department of Educational Studies, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. chen.4880@buckeyemail.osu.edu.
Gangqiang DingNational Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China. dinggq@chinacdc.cn.
Jun DaiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA. jun.dai@dmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7930-2885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nutrient intake dataset is crucial in epidemiological studies. The latest version of the food composition database includes more types of nutrients than previous ones and can be used to obtain data on nutrient intake that could not be estimated before. Usual food consumption data were collected among 910 twins between 1969 and 1973 through dietary history interviews, and then used to calculate intake of eight types of nutrients (energy intake, carbohydrate, protein, cholesterol, total fat, and saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids) in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Twin Study. We recalculated intakes using the food composition database updated in 2008. Several different statistical methods were used to evaluate the validity and the reliability of the recalculated intake data. Intra-class correlation coefficients between recalculated and original intake values were above 0.99 for all nutrients.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDietFood AnalysisNutritive ValueAdultDatasets as TopicEnergy IntakeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrientsReproducibility of ResultsNutrientsfood composition databasenutrienttwin study

Identifiers

PMID30625983
PMCPMC6356938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.