Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30625216›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Are multiple views superior to a single view when teaching hip surgery? A single-blinded randomized controlled trial of technical skill acquisition.

Huixiang Wang, Kapil Sugand, Simon Newman, Gareth Jones, Justin Cobb, Edouard Auvinet

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Use of Operative Video Technology in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Review
  3. Video-Based Learning in Orthopedic Education: A Systematic Mapping Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026
    Review
  4. A multi-camera, multi-view system for training and skill assessment for robot-assisted surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Huixiang WangMSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Kapil SugandMSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Simon NewmanMSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Gareth JonesMSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Justin CobbMSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Edouard AuvinetMSK Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-2499
Charing Cross Hospital · GBShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical education videos currently all use a single point of view (POV) with the trainee locked onto a fixed viewpoint, which may not deliver sufficient information for complex procedures. We developed a novel multiple POV video system and evaluated its training outcome compared with traditional single POV.

methodsWe filmed a hip resurfacing procedure performed by an expert attending using 8 cameras in theatre. 30 medical students were randomly and equally allocated to learn the procedure using the multiple POV (experiment group [EG]) versus single POV system (control group [CG]). Participants advanced a pin into the femoral head as demonstrated in the video. We measured the drilling trajectories and compared it with pre-operative plan to evaluate distance of the pin insertion and angular deviations. Two orthopedic attendings expertly evaluated the participants' performance using a modified global rating scale (GRS). There was a pre-video knowledge test that was repeated post-simulation alongside a Likert-scale questionnaire.

resultsThe angular deviation of the pin in EG was significantly less by 29% compared to CG (p = 0.037), with no significant difference in the entry point's distance between groups (p = 0.204). The GRS scores for EG were 3.5% higher than CG (p = 0.046). There was a 32% higher overall knowledge test score (p<0.001) and 21% improved Likert-scale questionnaire score (p = 0.002) after video-learning in EG than CG, albeit no significant difference in the knowledge test score before video-learning (p = 0.721).

conclusionThe novel multiple POV provided significant objective and subjective advantages over single POV for acquisition of technical skills in hip surgery.

Indexed as

AdultClinical CompetenceComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, MedicalFemaleHip JointHumansMaleOrthopedicsStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesVideo RecordingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30625216
PMCPMC6326427
OpenAlexW2908802104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.