Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30625184›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Controlled clinical trial of canine therapy versus usual care to reduce patient anxiety in the emergency department.

Jeffrey A Kline, Michelle A Fisher, Katherine L Pettit, Courtney T Linville, Alan M Beck

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03471429 (Canine-assisted ANxiety Reduction IN Emergency), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03471429 completednot on this map

Canine-assisted ANxiety Reduction IN Emergency

TypeobservationalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled80ConditionsAnxiety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Zoonotic Risks of Sleeping with Pets.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A One Health Perspective on the Human-Companion Animal Relationship with Emphasis on Zoonotic Aspects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  17. Patient Opinion of Visiting Therapy Dogs in a Hospital Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. The State of Animal-Assisted Interventions: Addressing the Contemporary Issues that will Shape the Future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey A KlineIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-3109
Michelle A FisherEskenazi Health, Indianapolis IN, United States of America.
Katherine L PettitIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Courtney T LinvilleIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Alan M BeckPurdue University, Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Lafayette, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0661-7672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTest if therapy dogs reduce anxiety in emergency department (ED) patients.

methodsIn this controlled clinical trial (NCT03471429), medically stable, adult patients were approached if the physician believed that the patient had "moderate or greater anxiety." Patients were allocated on a 1:1 ratio to either 15 min exposure to a certified therapy dog and handler (dog), or usual care (control). Patient reported anxiety, pain and depression were assessed using a 0-10 scale (10 = worst). Primary outcome was change in anxiety from baseline (T0) to 30 min and 90 min after exposure to dog or control (T1 and T2 respectively); secondary outcomes were pain, depression and frequency of pain medication.

resultsAmong 93 patients willing to participate in research, 7 had aversions to dogs, leaving 86 (92%) were willing to see a dog six others met exclusion criteria, leaving 40 patients allocated to each group (dog or control). Median and mean baseline anxiety, pain and depression scores were similar between groups. With dog exposure, median anxiety decreased significantly from T0 to T1: 6 (IQR 4-9.75) to T1: 2 (0-6) compared with 6 (4-8) to 6 (2.5-8) in controls (P<0.001, for T1, Mann-Whitney U and unpaired t-test). Dog exposure was associated with significantly lower anxiety at T2 and a significant overall treatment effect on two-way repeated measures ANOVA for anxiety, pain and depression. After exposure, 1/40 in the dog group needed pain medication, versus 7/40 in controls (P = 0.056, Fisher's exact test).

conclusionsExposure to therapy dogs plus handlers significantly reduced anxiety in ED patients.

Indexed as

Animal Assisted TherapyEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAnimalsAnxietyDepressionDogsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePainProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30625184
PMCPMC6326463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.