Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30625176›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Primary care management for patients receiving long-term antithrombotic treatment: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Andrea Siebenhofer, Lisa-Rebekka Ulrich, Karola Mergenthal, Andrea Berghold, Gudrun Pregartner, Birgit Kemperdick, Sylvia Schulz-Rothe, Sandra Rauck, Sebastian Harder, Ferdinand Michael Gerlach and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical service organisation for adults with atrial fibrillation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea SiebenhoferInstitute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-2103
Lisa-Rebekka UlrichInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andrea BergholdInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gudrun PregartnerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Birgit KemperdickInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sylvia Schulz-RotheInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sandra RauckInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sebastian HarderInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ferdinand Michael GerlachInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Juliana Johanna PetersenInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether applying case management in general practices reduces thromboembolic events requiring hospitalization and major bleeding events (combined primary outcome). Secondary endpoints were mortality, frequency and duration of hospitalization, severe treatment interactions, adverse events, quality of anticoagulation, health-related quality of life and intervention costs, patients' assessment of chronic illness care, self-reported adherence to medication, GP and HCA knowledge, patient knowledge and satisfaction with shared decision-making.

methodsCluster-randomized controlled trial undertaken at 52 general practices in Germany with adult patients with a long-term indication for oral anticoagulation. The complex intervention included training for healthcare assistants, information and quality circles for general practitioners and 24 months of case management for patients. Assessment was after 12 and 24 months. The intention-to-treat population included all randomized practices and patients, while the per-protocol analysis included only those that received treatment without major protocol violations.

resultsThe mean (SD) age of the 736 patients was 73.5 (9.4) years and 597 (81.1%) had atrial fibrillation. After 24 months, the primary endpoint had occurred in 40 (11.0%) intervention and 48 (12.9%) control patients (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.25; P = .37). Patients' perceived quality of care, their knowledge, and HCAs' knowledge, had improved significantly at 24 months. The other secondary endpoints did not differ between groups. In the intervention group, hospital admissions were significantly reduced in patients that received treatment without major protocol deviations.

conclusionsEven though the main outcomes did not differ significantly, the intervention appears to have positively influenced several process parameters under 'real-world conditions'.

Indexed as

Case ManagementPrimary Health CareAdministration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisEndpoint DeterminationFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsGeneral PracticeGermanyHemorrhageHospitalizationHumansMaleMedication AdherenceFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30625176
PMCPMC6326474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.