Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30625172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Calanoid copepod zooplankton density is positively associated with water residence time across the continental United States.

Jonathan P Doubek, Cayelan C Carey, Michael Lavender, Amanda K Winegardner, Marieke Beaulieu, Patrick T Kelly, Amina I Pollard, Dietmar Straile, Jason D Stockwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan P DoubekVirginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-4715
Cayelan C CareyVirginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Michael LavenderQueen's University, Biology Department, Biosciences Complex, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-3388
Amanda K WinegardnerMcGill University, Department of Biology, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Marieke BeaulieuUniversité de Sherbrooke, Département de Génie Civil, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Patrick T KellyBiology Department, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America.
Amina I PollardOffice of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Dietmar StraileLimnological Institute, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Jason D StockwellUniversity of Vermont, Rubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherent differences between naturally-formed lakes and human-made reservoirs may play an important role in shaping zooplankton community structure. For example, because many reservoirs are created by impounding and managing lotic systems for specific human purposes, zooplankton communities may be affected by factors that are unique to reservoirs, such as shorter water residence times and a reservoir's management regime, compared to natural lakes. However, the environmental factors that structure zooplankton communities in natural lakes vs. reservoirs may vary at the continental scale and remain largely unknown. We analyzed data from the 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Lakes Assessment and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' National Inventory of Dams to compare large-bodied crustacean zooplankton communities (defined here as individuals retained by 0.243 mm mesh size) in natural lakes and reservoirs across the continental U.S. using multiple linear regressions and regression tree analyses. We found that large-bodied crustacean zooplankton density was overall higher in natural lakes compared to reservoirs when the effect of latitude was controlled. The difference between waterbody types was driven by calanoid copepods, which were also more likely to be dominant in the >0.243 mm zooplankton community in natural lakes than in reservoirs. Regression tree analyses revealed that water residence time was not a major driver of calanoid copepod density in natural lakes but was one of the most important drivers of calanoid copepod density in reservoirs, which had on average 0.5-year shorter water residence times than natural lakes. Reservoirs managed for purposes that resulted in shorter residence times (e.g., hydroelectric power) had lower zooplankton densities than reservoirs managed for purposes that resulted in longer residence times (e.g., irrigation). Consequently, our results indicate that water residence time may be an important characteristic driving differing large-bodied zooplankton dynamics between reservoirs and natural lakes.

Indexed as

CopepodaEcosystemLakesZooplanktonAnimalsPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30625172
PMCPMC6326432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.