ArticlePloS one2019
Segmenting accelerometer data from daily life with unsupervised machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06169020 (Design of an Intelligent Wearable to Assess Physical Activity and Health Related Outcomes - the DIWAH Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Design of an Intelligent Wearable to Assess Physical Activity and Health Related Outcomes - the DIWAH Study
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: The Value of Using Microclimate Sensor Arrays.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020Pooled it
- A novel ViT-BILSTM model for physical activity intensity classification in adults using gravity-based acceleration.BMC biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Physical activity in young children across developmental and health states: theEClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Using unsupervised machine learning to quantify physical activity from accelerometry in a diverse and rapidly changing population.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Examination of physical activity development in early childhood: protocol for a longitudinal cohort study of mother-toddler dyads.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
- Timing of objectively-collected physical activity in relation to body weight and metabolic health in sedentary older people: a cross-sectional and prospective analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022Article
- The Dilemma of Analyzing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Wrist Accelerometer Data: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Novel approach to modeling high-frequency activity data to assess therapeutic effects of analgesics in chronic pain conditions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Novel Combination of Accelerometry and Ecological Momentary Assessment for Post-Stroke Paretic Arm/Hand Use: Feasibility and Validity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Advanced analytical methods to assess physical activity behaviour using accelerometer raw time series data: a protocol for a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Calibrating Wrist-Worn Accelerometers for Physical Activity Assessment in Preschoolers: Machine Learning Approaches.JMIR formative research · 2020Article
- Evaluating the performance of raw and epoch non-wear algorithms using multiple accelerometers and electrocardiogram recordings.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Activity Mapping of Children in Play Using Multivariate Analysis of Movement Events.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2020Article
- Physical activity assessment by accelerometry in people with heart failure.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Towards a Portable Model to Discriminate Activity Clusters from Accelerometer Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Calibration and Validation of the Youth Activity Profile as a Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Surveillance Tool for English Youth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccelerometers are increasingly used to obtain valuable descriptors of physical activity for health research. The cut-points approach to segment accelerometer data is widely used in physical activity research but requires resource expensive calibration studies and does not make it easy to explore the information that can be gained for a variety of raw data metrics. To address these limitations, we present a data-driven approach for segmenting and clustering the accelerometer data using unsupervised machine learning.
methodsThe data used came from five hundred fourteen-year-old participants from the Millennium cohort study who wore an accelerometer (GENEActiv) on their wrist on one weekday and one weekend day. A Hidden Semi-Markov Model (HSMM), configured to identify a maximum of ten behavioral states from five second averaged acceleration with and without addition of x, y, and z-angles, was used for segmenting and clustering of the data. A cut-points approach was used as comparison.
resultsTime spent in behavioral states with or without angle metrics constituted eight and five principal components to reach 95% explained variance, respectively; in comparison four components were identified with the cut-points approach. In the HSMM with acceleration and angle as input, the distributions for acceleration in the states showed similar groupings as the cut-points categories, while more variety was seen in the distribution of angles.
conclusionOur unsupervised classification approach learns a construct of human behavior based on the data it observes, without the need for resource expensive calibration studies, has the ability to combine multiple data metrics, and offers a higher dimensional description of physical behavior. States are interpretable from the distributions of observations and by their duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.