Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30624838›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2019

The decline of dengue in the Americas in 2017: discussion of multiple hypotheses.

Freddy Perez, Anthony Llau, Gamaliel Gutierrez, Haroldo Bezerra, Giovanini Coelho, Steven Ault, Sulamita Brandao Barbiratto, Marcelo Carballo de Resende, Lizbeth Cerezo, Giovanni Luz Kleber and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections among Dutch travellers to Suriname: a prospective study during the introduction of chikungunya and Zika virus, 2014 to 2017.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Freddy PerezCommunicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health Department, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.
Anthony LlauRobert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Gamaliel GutierrezNeglected, Tropical and Vector-borne Diseases, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.
Haroldo BezerraNeglected, Tropical and Vector-borne Diseases, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.
Giovanini CoelhoNeglected, Tropical and Vector-borne Diseases, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.
Steven AultDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Sulamita Brandao BarbirattoNational Dengue Control Program, Ministry of Health, Brasilia, Brazil.
Marcelo Carballo de ResendeDepartment of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lizbeth CerezoNational Epidemiology Department, Ministry of Health of Panama, Panama City, Panama.
Giovanni Luz KleberDepartamento de Infectologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Hospital, Natal, Brazil.
Oscar PachecoPublic Health Prevention and Surveillance, Ministry of Health, Bogota, Colombia.
Octavio Lenin PerezDengue Program, Ministry of Health, Managua, Nicaragua.
Victor PicosResearch Laboratory of Dengue and other Viral Diseases, Ministry of Health, Maracay, Venezuela.
Diana P RojasDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Joao Bosco SiqueiraFederal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.
Marco Fidel SuarezUniversidad Mayor de San Andres, La Paz, Bolivia.
Eva HarrisCenter for Global Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Luis Gerardo CastellanosNeglected, Tropical and Vector-borne Diseases, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.
Carlos EspinalRobert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Jose Luis San MartinNeglected, Tropical and Vector-borne Diseases, PAHO, Washington, DC, USA.
Vector & Vector-Borne Diseases Research Institute · TZFlorida International University · USMinistério da Saúde · BRHigher University of San Andrés · BOJahrom University of Medical Sciences · IRMinistry of Health and Social Protection · CONational Hospital · PAPetroleum of Venezuela (Venezuela) · VEUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSince the 1980s, dengue incidence has increased 30-fold. However, in 2017, there was a noticeable reduction in reported dengue incidence cases within the Americas, including severe and fatal cases. Understanding the mechanism underlying dengue's incidence and decline in the Americas is vital for public health planning. We aimed to provide plausible explanations for the decline in 2017.

methodsAn expert panel of representatives from scientific and academic institutions, Ministry of Health officials from Latin America and PAHO/WHO staff met in October 2017 to propose hypotheses. The meeting employed six moderated plenary discussions in which participants reviewed epidemiological evidence, suggested explanatory hypotheses, offered their expert opinions on each and developed a consensus.

resultsThe expert group established that in 2017, there was a generalised decreased incidence, severity and number of deaths due to dengue in the Americas, accompanied by a reduction in reported cases of both Zika and chikungunya virus infections, with no change in distribution among age groups affected. This decline was determined to be unlikely due to changes in epidemiological surveillance systems, as similar designs of surveillance systems exist across the region. Although sudden surveillance disruption is possible at a country or regional level, it is unlikely to occur in all countries simultaneously. Retrospective modelling with epidemiological, immunological and entomological information is needed. Host or immunological factors may have influenced the decline in dengue cases at the population level through immunity; however, herd protection requires additional evidence. Uncertainty remains regarding the effect on the outcome of sequential infections of different dengue virus (DENV) types and Zika virus (ZIKV), and vice versa. Future studies were recommended that examine the epidemiological effect of prior DENV infection on Zika incidence and severity, the epidemiological effect of prior Zika virus infection on dengue incidence and severity, immune correlates based on new-generation ELISA assays, and impact of prior DENV/other arbovirus infection on ZIKV immune response in relation to number of infections and the duration of antibodies in relation to interval of protection. Follow-up studies should also investigate whether increased vector control intensification activities contributed to the decline in transmission of one or more of these arboviruses. Additionally, proposed studies should focus on the potential role of vector competence when simultaneously exposed to various arboviruses, and on entomological surveillance and its impact on circulating vector species, with a goal of applying specific measures that mitigate seasonal occurrence or outbreaks.

conclusionsMultifactorial events may have accounted for the decline in dengue seen in 2017. Differing elements might explain the reduction in dengue including elements of immunity, increased vector control, and even vector and\or viruses changes or adaptations. Most of the results of this expert consensus group meeting are hypothetical and based on limited evidence. Further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Dengue VirusAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCentral AmericaChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusConsensusDengueDisease OutbreaksDisease VectorsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansIncidenceNorth AmericaSouth AmericaUnited StatesAntibodies, ViralAmericasAmériquesdéclindeclinedengueDenguehypotheseshypothèses

Identifiers

PMID30624838
PMCPMC6850595
OpenAlexW2908608989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.