ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019
Extracting chemical-protein interactions from literature using sentence structure analysis and feature engineering.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine in Enhancing HIV Management and Treatment Outcomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A comprehensive large scale biomedical knowledge graph for AI powered data driven biomedical research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of the potential biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Eleven quick tips for data cleaning and feature engineering.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Pre-trained models, data augmentation, and ensemble learning for biomedical information extraction and document classification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- LPInsider: a webserver for lncRNA-protein interaction extraction from the literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Deep semi-supervised learning ensemble framework for classifying co-mentions of human proteins and phenotypes.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Recent advances in biomedical literature mining.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- CGINet: graph convolutional network-based model for identifying chemical-gene interaction in an integrated multi-relational graph.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Triage of documents containing protein interactions affected by mutations using an NLP based machine learning approach.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Extraction of chemical-protein interactions from the literature using neural networks and narrow instance representation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Information about the interactions between chemical compounds and proteins is indispensable for understanding the regulation of biological processes and the development of therapeutic drugs. Manually extracting such information from biomedical literature is very time and resource consuming. In this study, we propose a computational method to automatically extract chemical-protein interactions (CPIs) from a given text. Our method extracts CPI pairs and CPI triplets from sentences, where a CPI pair consists of a chemical compound and a protein name, and a CPI triplet consists of a CPI pair along with an interaction word describing their relationship. We extracted a diverse set of features from sentences that were used to build multiple machine learning models. Our models contain both simple features, which can be directly computed from sentences, and more sophisticated features derived using sentence structure analysis techniques. For example, one set of features was extracted based on the shortest paths between the CPI pairs or among the CPI triplets in the dependency graphs obtained from sentence parsing. We designed a three-stage approach to predict the multiple categories of CPIs. Our method performed the best among systems that use non-deep learning methods and outperformed several deep-learning-based systems in the track 5 of the BioCreative VI challenge. The features we designed in this study are informative and can be applied to other machine learning methods including deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.