Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30624578›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2019

Evaluation of the Response of Unresectable Primary Cutaneous Melanoma to Immunotherapy Visualized With Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Report of 2 Cases.

Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Miguel Cordova, Michael A Postow, Melissa Pulitzer, Cecilia Lezcano, Allan C Halpern, Anthony M Rossi

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristian Navarrete-DechentDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Miguel CordovaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael A PostowMelanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Melissa PulitzerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cecilia LezcanoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Allan C HalpernDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anthony M RossiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Melanoma incidence and the use of systemic treatments for it are rising. Current treatment monitoring uses clinical examination and radiologic examinations; however, cutaneous involvement and cutaneous metastasis may not be well visualized. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved, noninvasive technology that enables visualization of the skin with quasihistological resolution. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using RCM to monitor advanced melanomas treated with immunotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case report study took place from March 2017 to June 2018 and included 2 patients with locally advanced melanoma who were not candidates for surgery or were not willing to have surgery and who were started on an immunotherapy regimen at a tertiary care cancer hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical and RCM findings correlated with histopathology. Results: In the patients, locally advanced melanoma with cutaneous involvement was treated with immunotherapy (pembrolizumab in 1 patient and an ipilimumab-nivolumab combination in the other) with resulting clearance of the lesions. Use of RCM showed the disappearance of clear melanoma features seen at baseline; these findings correlated with histopathology. The response was not seen with radiologic images, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Conclusions and Relevance: Although RCM will not replace larger field imaging (such as magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography) in the management and follow-up of melanoma or other tumors, for imaging of cutaneous involvement and disease monitoring, RCM holds promise as a novel noninvasive technique.

Indexed as

ScalpAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiopsy, NeedleCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDermoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyMaleMelanomaMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID30624578
PMCPMC6440283
OpenAlexW2910777889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.