Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30624464›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2019

Mechanical-physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of catechin-incorporated adhesive resins.

Beatriz Maria Fonseca, Daphne Camara Barcellos, Tânia Mara da Silva, Alexandre Luis Souto Borges, Bruno das Neves Cavalcanti, Anuradha Prakki, Hueder Paulo Moisés de Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in restorative dentistry.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development and Physicochemical Characterization ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Polyphenols in Dental Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Beatriz Maria FonsecaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Grupo Acadêmico de Pesquisa Clínica, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-7380
Daphne Camara BarcellosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Grupo Acadêmico de Pesquisa Clínica, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3588-7620
Tânia Mara da SilvaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Grupo Acadêmico de Pesquisa Clínica, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-6905
Alexandre Luis Souto BorgesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Grupo Acadêmico de Pesquisa Clínica, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-7565
Bruno das Neves CavalcantiUniversity of Iowa, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Department of Endodontics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0455-4823
Anuradha PrakkiUniversity of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Restorative Department, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8969-9043
Hueder Paulo Moisés de OliveiraCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-1461
Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva GonçalvesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Grupo Acadêmico de Pesquisa Clínica, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-0393
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BRUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral anti-proteolytic dentin therapies are being exhaustively studied in an attempt to reduce dentin bond degradation and improve clinical performance and longevity of adhesive restorations. This study assessed the effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on long-term bond strength when incorporated into adhesives. MATERIAL AND

methodsAdhesive systems were formulated with EGCG concentrations of 0 wt%: (no EGCG; control); 0.5 wt% EGCG; 1.0 wt% EGCG, and 1.5 wt% EGCG. Flexural strength (FS), modulus of elasticity (ME), modulus of resilience (MR), compressive strength (CS), degree of conversion (DC), polymerization shrinkage (PS), percentage of water sorption (%WS), percentage of water solubility (%WL) and cytotoxicity properties were tested. Dentin microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was evaluated after 24 h and again after 6 months of water storage. The adhesive interface was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

resultsNo significant differences were found among the groups in terms of FS, ME, MR, CS and PS. EGCG-doped adhesives increased the DC relative to the control group. EGCG concentrations of 1.0 wt% and 0.5 wt% decreased the WS of adhesives. WL decreased in all cases in which EGCG was added to adhesives, regardless of the concentration. EGCG concentrations of 1.0 wt% and 0.5 wt% reduced cytotoxicity. EGCG concentrations of 1.0 wt% and 0.5 wt% preserved µTBS after 6 months of storage, while 1.5 wt% EGCG significantly decreased µTBS. SEM: the integrity of the hybrid layer was maintained in the 0.5 wt% and 1.0 wt% EGCG groups.

conclusionEGCG concentrations of 1.0 wt% and 0.5 wt% showed better biological and mechanical performance, preserved bond strength and adhesive interface, and reduced cytotoxicity.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateCamphorCatechinCell LineCell SurvivalCompressive StrengthDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsElastic ModulusFibroblastsFlexural StrengthHumansMaterials TestingMethacrylatesMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylateBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateCamphorcamphorquinoneCatechinDentin-Bonding Agentsepigallocatechin gallatehydroxyethyl methacrylateMethacrylatesWater

Identifiers

PMID30624464
PMCPMC6322639
OpenAlexW2908220329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.