Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30624339›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2019

A Flow Dynamic Rationale for Accelerated Vascularized Composite Allotransplant Rejection.

Nicholas L Robbins, Matthew J Wordsworth, Bijaya K Parida, Bruce Kaplan, Vijay S Gorantla, Col Erik K Weitzel, Warren C Breidenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas L RobbinsFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Matthew J WordsworthFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Bijaya K ParidaFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Bruce KaplanFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Vijay S GorantlaFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Col Erik K WeitzelFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Warren C BreidenbachFrom the RESTOR Program, 59th Medical Wing, and the San Antonio Military Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio; University of Texas Health at San Antonio; Baylor Scott & White Health; and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom 1996 to 2000, Diefenbeck et al. carried out six knee vascularized composite allotransplants. The allotransplants were composed of bone, soft tissue, and femoral vascular pedicle (25 to 40 cm). All rejected between 14 and 56 months. Failures were attributed to chronic rejection. In 2008, the Louisville team lost their fourth patient's hand transplant at 8 months. During the rejection workup, intraoperative findings noted a thickened arterial pedicle attributed to intimal hyperplasia with significant fibrotic perivascular tissue and a near "no-flow phenomenon." No cutaneous rejection was appreciated and failure was attributed to chronic rejection.

methodsData were collected from two teams, one in Germany and the other in Louisville, Kentucky. The population under study consisted of the six knee and one hand transplants. The factor of interest was the long donor arterial pedicle. The outcome measurements were transplant survival time and histopathologic results.

resultsThere are only seven published vascularized composite allotransplant cases where a donor artery longer than 25 cm was used. This cohort represents a 100 percent accelerated failure rate. The cause of these losses remains unexplained. The donor arteries suffered from T-cell-mediated rejection and ischemia-induced media/adventitial necrosis.

conclusionsWe hypothesize that the donor artery rejected at an accelerated rate because of ischemia caused by disruption of the external vasa vasorum in conjunction with intimal hyperplasia induced by T-cell-mediated rejection that led to disruption of the Windkessel effect. Loss of this effect presented as intimal hyperplasia accelerated by ischemia causing an expedited transplant failure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Indexed as

ArteriesComposite Tissue AllograftsGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHand TransplantationHumansHyperplasiaIschemiaKneeRegional Blood FlowTime FactorsT-LymphocytesTunica IntimaVasa VasorumVascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID30624339
PMCPMC6400451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.