Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30623374›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2019

Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex Modulation of Contextual Fear Memory Is Dissociated by Inhibiting De Novo Transcription During Late Consolidation.

Luciana M Pereira, Caio M de Castro, Lorena T L Guerra, Thaís M Queiroz, João T Marques, Grace Schenatto Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luciana M PereiraNúcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, CEP 31270-901, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Caio M de CastroNúcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, CEP 31270-901, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Lorena T L GuerraNúcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, CEP 31270-901, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Thaís M QueirozNúcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, CEP 31270-901, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
João T MarquesDepartamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Grace Schenatto PereiraNúcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, CEP 31270-901, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. grace@icb.ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4371-7020

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico PVE 401273/2014Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Procad 88881.068460/2014-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ01396-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To uncover the factors that dictate the persistence of a memory, it is critical to determine the molecular basis of consolidation. Here, we submitted male adult C57/BL6 mice to contextual fear conditioning using 1US (US: foot-shock, 0.7 mA, 2 s) or 5US, to generate recent (24 to 48 h) and remote (30 days) memories, respectively. To access the functional role of de novo transcription, we injected actinomycin D (ActD: 2.5 ng/side) directly into the dorsal hippocampus (HIP) or dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), 0 (early consolidation) or 12 h (late consolidation) after training. Our results showed that de novo transcription at 0 h was required for recent and remote memories. However, 12 h was a critical time point to memory persistence. In the dHIP, de novo transcription at 12 h post-training differentiated the recent memory from the remote. In the dmPFC, ActD affected memory formation depending on the training intensity (1 or 5US). Specifically, freezing was amplified after 5US conditioning. Furthermore, inhibiting de novo transcription at 12 h post-training in the dmPFC rapidly increased c-Fos expression in the amygdala. Altogether, our results indicate that contextual fear memory duration is particularly sensitive to de novo transcription in the dHIP and dmPFC, at a specific time point of late consolidation.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAmygdalaAnimalsBiomarkersBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCytoskeletal ProteinsElectroshockFearGene Expression RegulationHippocampusMaleMemory ConsolidationMice, Inbred C57BLNerve Tissue ProteinsPrefrontal CortexRNAactivity regulated cytoskeletal-associated proteinBiomarkersBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCytoskeletal ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRNARNA, MessengerContextual fear memoryDe novo transcriptionDorsal hippocampusDorsomedial prefrontal cortexLate consolidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.