Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30623347›Full record

ReviewDrugs2019

Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity after Stroke.

Andrea Santamato, Nicoletta Cinone, Francesco Panza, Sara Letizia, Luigi Santoro, Madia Lozupone, Antonio Daniele, Alessandro Picelli, Alessio Baricich, Domenico Intiso and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea SantamatoPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, "OORR Hospital", University of Foggia, Viale Pinto, 71100, Foggia, Italy. andrea.santamato@unifg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-8485
Nicoletta CinonePhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, "OORR Hospital", University of Foggia, Viale Pinto, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
Francesco PanzaNeurodegenerative Disease Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Sara LetiziaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, "OORR Hospital", University of Foggia, Viale Pinto, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
Luigi SantoroPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, "OORR Hospital", University of Foggia, Viale Pinto, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
Madia LozuponeNeurodegenerative Disease Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Antonio DanieleInstitute of Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro PicelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alessio BaricichHealth Sciences Department, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Domenico IntisoDepartment of Neuro-Rehabilitation IRCCS, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
Maurizio RanieriPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, "OORR Hospital", University of Foggia, Viale Pinto, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-stroke lower limb spasticity impairs balance and gait leading to reduced walking speed, often increasing wheelchair use and caregiver burden. Several studies have shown that appropriate treatments for lower limb spasticity after stroke include injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A), phenol or alcohol, surgical correction and a rehabilitation program. In the present article, we review the safety and effectiveness of BoNT-A for the treatment of lower limb spasticity after stroke, with a focus on higher doses of BoNT-A. The cumulative body of evidence coming from the randomized clinical trials and open-label studies selected in the article suggest BoNT-A to be safe and efficacious in reducing lower limb spasticity after stroke. Studies of high doses of BoNT-A also showed a greater reduction of severe post-stroke spasticity. In stroke survivors with spasticity of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles, a combined approach between surgery and BoNT-A can be indicated. However, controversy remains about improvement in motor function relative to post-stroke spasticity reduction after BoNT-A treatment.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AHumansInjections, IntramuscularLower ExtremityMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsStrokeTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID30623347
OpenAlexW2909175756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.