ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019
A global perspective on the biology, impact and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome and transcriptome analyses reveal parallel altitude adaptation in Chenopodium.Genome biology · 2026Article
- A sustainable strategy for alfalfa establishment: optimized reduced-rate tank mixtures for controlling Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Multi-Target Herbicidal Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing soybean (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic profiling reveals Agave Lechuguilla extract as a multi-target pre-emergent bioherbicide candidate against Chenopodium album.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transcriptome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Bioherbicidal Evaluation of Methanol Extract ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrative analyses of metabolome and transcriptome identifies the potential mechanism of Aureobasidium pullulans PA-2 inhibiting Chenopodium album L. growth.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- A pangenome reveals LTR repeat dynamics as a major driver of genome evolution in Chenopodium.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Allelopathic pathways and impacts of Chenopodium species via leachates, decaying residues, and essential oils.PloS one · 2025Article
- Assessing the potential of fedaleh (Heliyon · 2024Article
- Geographical-Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important FamilyBiology · 2024Article
- Does weed diversity mitigate yield losses?Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Distinct hormonal and morphological control of dormancy and germination inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Seed Germination Ecology ofBiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Redroot Pigweed (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chenopodium album and C. murale are cosmopolitan, annual weed species of notable economic importance. Their unique biological features, including high reproductive capacity, seed dormancy, high persistence in the soil seed bank, the ability to germinate and grow under a wide range of environmental conditions and abiotic stress tolerance, help these species to infest diverse cropping systems. C. album and C. murale grow tall and absorb nutrients very efficiently. Both these species are allelopathic in nature and, thus, suppress the germination and growth of native vegetation and/or crop plants. These weed species infest many agronomic and horticultural crops and may cause > 90% loss in crop yields. C. album is more problematic than C. murale as the former is more widespread and infests more number of crops, and it also acts as an alternate host of several crop pests. Different cultural and mechanical methods have been used to control these weed species with varying degrees of success depending upon the cropping systems and weed infestation levels. Similarly, allelopathy and biological control have also shown some potential, especially in controlling C. album. Several herbicides have been successfully used to control these species, but the evolution of wide-scale herbicide resistance in C. album has limited the efficacy of chemical control. However, the use of alternative herbicides in rotation and the integration of chemicals and biologically based control methods may provide a sustainable control of C. album and C. murale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.