Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30623306›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2019

The role of immediate versus secondary removal of the odontogenic focus in treatment of deep head and neck space infections. A retrospective analysis of 248 patients.

Nils Heim, Felix Benjamin Warwas, Valentin Wiedemeyer, Christian Timm Wilms, Rudolf H Reich, Markus Martini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of early extraction of odontogenic focus in deep neck infections.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Surgical multidisciplinary approach in the management of odontogenic or non-odontogenic neck infections.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deep neck space infections: an upward trend and changing characteristics.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nils HeimDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. nils.heim@web.de.
Felix Benjamin WarwasDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Valentin WiedemeyerDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Christian Timm WilmsDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Rudolf H ReichDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Markus MartiniDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAim of this study was to investigate conditions and predisposing factors for head and neck infection progress regarding the length of stay (LOS) in hospital, with special emphasis on the time of removal of the odontogenic infection focus. MATERIAL AND

methodsA 3-year retrospective study reviewed hospital records of 248 subjects who were treated under inpatient conditions with severe odontogenic infections who received surgical incisions, drainage, and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Outcomes measured included age, gender, involved fascial spaces, LOS, number of infected spaces, antibiotics administered, and comorbidities. We precisely recorded the time between abscess incision and focus extraction.

resultsRemoval of infection focus (tooth) in the same stay (1 stay, n = 106; group 1; mean 6.5 days ± 3) showed significantly higher (p = 0.042) LOS than extraction in a second stay (2 stays, n = 46; group 2; 5.3 ± 3.1). Group 3 patients showed infection after removal of teeth in outpatient management (1 stay ex-op, n = 96) and presented significantly lower LOS (5.6 ± 2.5) compared to group 1 (p = 0.0216). LOS of group 3 to group 2 patients showed no significance (p = 0.668). Infection expansion and diabetes showed a significant increase of LOS.

conclusionSimultaneous removal of infection focus and abscess incision leads to the lowest LOS. If tooth extraction is performed after incision, subsequent focus extraction performed in a second stay shows lower overall-LOS than extraction at the same stay at later stage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multiple factors tend to increase the LOS of patients with severe head and neck infections of odontogenic origin. Our data reveals the role of removal of odontogenic focus and additionally ranks further parameters that influence the LOS. Based on our findings, decisions regarding the surgical treatment can be recommended.

Indexed as

HeadInfectionsLength of StayNeckAbscessChildHumansMouth DiseasesRetrospective StudiesHead and neck infectionLength of stay in hospitalLOSOdontogenic abscess

Identifiers

PMID30623306
OpenAlexW2910017497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.