Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30623052›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2018

Examining the reliability, correlation, and validity of commonly used assessment tools to measure balance.

Nicole Dawson, Darcy Dzurino, Melissa Karleskint, Jennifer Tucker

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04181450 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Biodex Balance System Cut-off Scores in Geriatric Individuals With Non-Specific Low Back Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled52ConditionsLow Back Pain, Balance, DistortedArmsDetermination of the Cut-off Scores of Biodex Balance System
NCT05139758 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Correlation Between Anthropometric Measurements And Balance IN Children With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsAnthropometric Measurements&Balance IN CP ChildrenArmsBiodex Balane System
NCT07770854 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Machine Learning Prediction of Pulmonary Function in Children With Cystic Fibrosis: Multidimensional Analysis of Peripheral Muscle Oxygenation, Postural Balance, and Clinical-Functional Markers

TypeobservationalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled31ConditionsCystic Fibrosis (CF)ArmsArchived Multidimensional Clinical and Functional Assessment Data
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole DawsonDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-055X
Darcy DzurinoDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA.
Melissa KarleskintDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA.
Jennifer TuckerDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy University of Central Florida Orlando FL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Biodex SD Stability System has been shown to be a reliable assessment tool for postural stability. However, its ability to provide an accurate representation of balance has not been compared with functional performance measures such as the four-square step test (FSST) and timed-up-and-go test (TUG). The purpose of this study was to investigate reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of FSST, TUG, and Biodex SD (limits of stability [LOS] and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance [m-CTSIB]).

methodsAn observational reliability and validity study was conducted. A convenience sample of 105 healthy adults, 77 females and 28 males, mean age 24.5 years old (± 4.66 SD) performed balance assessments including the FSST, TUG, Biodex SD LOS, and m-CTSIB. For LOS, the overall percentage and test duration were recorded. For m-CTSIB, the overall Sway Index was recorded. Condition 1 of the m-CTSIB represented simple postural stability.

resultsThe Biodex SD LOS overall percentage, TUG, and FSST showed strong to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .83 [mean 1: 58.14, mean 2: 60.54], .88 [mean 1: 6.98 seconds, mean 2: 6.91 seconds], .92 [mean 1: 6.29 seconds, mean 2: 6.14 seconds], respectively), while the Biodex SD m-CTSIB overall percentage demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .75 [mean 1: 1.18, mean 2: 1.18]). The LOS test duration showed moderate test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .58 [mean 1: 38.55 seconds, mean 2: 37.10 seconds]), while the m-CTSIB condition 1 showed poor test-retest reliability (ICC [3, 1] = .24 [mean 1: 0.63, mean 2: 0.66]). Weak construct validity was found between TUG, FSST, and Biodex SD measures of LOS and m-CTSIB (

conclusionIt is suggested that clinicians use more than one measure to assess different aspects of a patient's balance deficits to better guide treatment and intervention.

Indexed as

patient outcome assessmentpostural balancepsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID30623052
PMCPMC6295615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.