Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30623032›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2018

Exploring women's experiences with a decision aid for neoadjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer.

Anne Herrmann, Frances Boyle, Phyllis Butow, Alix E Hall, Nicholas Zdenkowski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne HerrmannPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute Callaghan Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8855-4176
Frances BoylePatricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research Mater Hospital, North Sydney Sydney Australia.
Phyllis ButowCentre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology University of Sydney Sydney Australia.
Alix E HallPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute Callaghan Australia.
Nicholas ZdenkowskiPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute Callaghan Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUMater Health Services · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome women with operable breast cancer have a choice between receiving upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy or neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) prior to receiving surgery. While survival outcomes are equivalent for both options, the decision about treatment sequence can be difficult due to its complexity and perceived urgency. A decision aid has been developed to help patients decide on whether to receive NAST.

aimsTo explore, qualitatively, women's use and perceived benefit of a decision aid to help with their decision on NAST.

methodsA framework analysis process was conducted on a purposeful sample of 20, one-on-one, semistructured phone interviews with early-stage breast cancer patients eligible for NAST. Participants had recently decided on whether or not to have NAST.

resultsPatients perceived the decision aid as useful to becoming more informed and involved in making a decision as to whether they receive NAST. They described the information provided in the decision aid as reliable, relevant, sufficient in terms of amount, and tailored to their needs. Reading and rereading the decision aid at home in-between the consultations with their surgeon and their medical oncologist allowed women to better understand their treatment options and easily integrate the decision aid into their care. The decision aid seemed to confirm but not change women's decisions on NAST.

conclusionThe decision aid appears to help breast cancer patients support their decision about whether to receive NAST. Patients' ability to review the decision aid in-between two consultations seems to be an acceptable and feasible way of integrating the decision aid into patients' care.

Indexed as

breast cancerdecision aiddecision makingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30623032
PMCPMC6266373
OpenAlexW2746802909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.