ArticleHealth science reports2018
Exploring women's experiences with a decision aid for neoadjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer.
Article in Health science reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences of Using Patient Decision Aids for Decisions About Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Aggregation of Qualitative Studies.Cancer nursingPooled it
- Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Review
- Article
- Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Improving shared decision making in virtual breast cancer surgery consultations.American journal of surgery · 2023Review
- A qualitative study on patients' and their support persons' preferences for receiving one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The need for patient-centered research.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Exploring women's experiences with a decision aid for neoadjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer.Health science reports · 2018Article
- Patient Perceptions of a Decision Support Tool for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome women with operable breast cancer have a choice between receiving upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy or neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) prior to receiving surgery. While survival outcomes are equivalent for both options, the decision about treatment sequence can be difficult due to its complexity and perceived urgency. A decision aid has been developed to help patients decide on whether to receive NAST.
aimsTo explore, qualitatively, women's use and perceived benefit of a decision aid to help with their decision on NAST.
methodsA framework analysis process was conducted on a purposeful sample of 20, one-on-one, semistructured phone interviews with early-stage breast cancer patients eligible for NAST. Participants had recently decided on whether or not to have NAST.
resultsPatients perceived the decision aid as useful to becoming more informed and involved in making a decision as to whether they receive NAST. They described the information provided in the decision aid as reliable, relevant, sufficient in terms of amount, and tailored to their needs. Reading and rereading the decision aid at home in-between the consultations with their surgeon and their medical oncologist allowed women to better understand their treatment options and easily integrate the decision aid into their care. The decision aid seemed to confirm but not change women's decisions on NAST.
conclusionThe decision aid appears to help breast cancer patients support their decision about whether to receive NAST. Patients' ability to review the decision aid in-between two consultations seems to be an acceptable and feasible way of integrating the decision aid into patients' care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.