ReviewJournal of research in pharmacy practice
The Clinical Efficacy of Imiglucerase versus Eliglustat in Patients with Gaucher's Disease Type 1: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of research in pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06162338 (A Prospective, Single-center, Open-arm, Single-arm Study of the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Single Intravenous Infusion Administration of LY-M001 Injection in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Gaucher Disease Type I), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Single-center, Open-arm, Single-arm Study of the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Single Intravenous Infusion Administration of LY-M001 Injection in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Gaucher Disease Type I
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Treatment, 2-Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Trial
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral AL01211 in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Trial
- Treatment with THI, an inhibitor of sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase, modulates glycosphingolipid metabolism and results therapeutically effective in experimental models of Huntington's disease.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023Article
- Real-Life Experience with Oral Eliglustat in Patients with Gaucher Disease Previously Treated with Enzyme Replacement Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Gaucher disease - more than just a rare lipid storage disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- Lysosomal Storage Disease-Associated Neuropathy: Targeting Stable Nucleic Acid Lipid Particle (SNALP)-Formulated siRNAs to the Brain as a Therapeutic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaucher's disease (GD) is one of the most common lysosomal diseases in humans. It results from β-glucosidase deficiency and leads to necrosis, especially in macrophages with the accumulation of glucosylceramidase in cells. Most of the deleterious effects of the disease are seen in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Imiglucerase with Eliglustat in treating patients with GD. PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to August, 2018. Predefined inclusion criteria for included studies were based on search methodology and are as follows: All randomized, quasi-randomized controlled, and cohort studies about patients with GD Type 1 that Imiglucerase was compared with Eliglustat were included. Two authors independently choose the papers based on the inclusion criteria. From 2979 recognized studies, three studies including two randomized clinical trials and one cohort study were recognized to meet the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were hemoglobin level, platelets count, liver, and spleen size, and the secondary outcomes were the immunological side effects of the medicines and bone complications. The results showed that there is no meaningful difference between the two medicines in terms of increasing blood hemoglobin, platelets count, and reducing the liver and spleen size. The findings of this review showed that both medicines are effective in the treatment of GD Type 1 and there is no statistically significant difference between their efficacies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.