Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622905›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2019

Toxicity bioassay of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel on marine microalgae.

K S Pikula, A M Zakharenko, V V Chaika, A K Stratidakis, M Kokkinakis, G Waissi, V N Rakitskii, D A Sarigiannis, A W Hayes, M D Coleman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toxicology reports · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Toxicity assessment of the greenToxicology reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

K S PikulaFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova Street, 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russian Federation.
A M ZakharenkoFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova Street, 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russian Federation.
V V ChaikaFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova Street, 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russian Federation.
A K StratidakisLaboratory of Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion 71003, Greece.
M KokkinakisLaboratory of Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion 71003, Greece.
G WaissiUniversity of Eastern Finland, School of Pharmacy, POB 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
V N RakitskiiThe Federal Budgetary Establishment of Science "Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F. F. Erisman" of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing, 2 Semashko street, Mytishchi, Moscow Oblast', 141014, Russian Federation.
D A SarigiannisAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Chemical Engineering, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
A W HayesUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
M D ColemanSchool of Life & Health Sciences, Pharmaceutics Dept., Aston University, B4 7ET, Birmingham, England, UK.
A TsatsakisFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova Street, 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russian Federation.
K S GolokhvastFar Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova Street, 8, Vladivostok 690950, Russian Federation.
Far Eastern Federal University · RUUniversity of Crete · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRAston University · GBFederal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing · RUUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world biodiesel production is increasing at a rapid rate. Despite its perceived safety for the environment, more detailed toxicity studies are mandatory, especially in the field of aquatic toxicology. While considerable attention has been paid to biodiesel combustion emissions, the toxicity of biodiesel in the aquatic environment has been poorly understood. In our study, we used an algae culture growth-inhibition test (OECD 201) for the comparison of the toxicity of B100 (pure biodiesel), produced by methanol transesterification of waste cooking oil (yellow grease), B0 (petroleum diesel fuel) and B20 (diesel-biodiesel blended of 20% biodiesel and 80% petroleum diesel fuel by volume). Two marine diatoms

Indexed as

Aquatic pollutionBiodieselBiodiesel blendsEcotoxicologyMicroalgaeWaste cooking oil biodiesel

Identifiers

PMID30622905
PMCPMC6317304
OpenAlexW2907350879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.