Review3 Biotech2019
Principles of gene editing techniques and applications in animal husbandry.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Gene Editing Technology in Poultry.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics Regulatory Role of miRNAs on Adipogenesis and Intramuscular Fat Development in Beef Cattle: In the Context of Meat Quality.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- BioMutation: a portable graphical user interface for mutagenesis and feature analysis in proteins, nucleic acids, and their complexes.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Novel plant breeding techniques to advance nitrogen use efficiency in rice: A review.GM crops & food · 2021Review
- Molecular mechanisms of intermuscular bone development in fish: a review.Zoological research · 2021Review
- Lysosomal storage diseases: current therapies and future alternatives.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene editing techniques were developed chronologically, which include zinc finger nuclease, transcription activator-like effector nuclease and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas 9). In this review, the working principles of these techniques were first introduced, their advantages and disadvantages were then discussed, their application in animal husbandry were elaborated, and finally human concerns about gene editing were presented. Compared to the two former techniques, the third-generation gene editing technique CRISPR/Cas9 has higher targeting efficiency and accuracy, less off-target effect, lower cytotoxicity and lower costs for being easier for vector design and manipulation. Although some people may concern about social or ethical issues, the benefits of gene editing certainly overweigh its demerits. The three gene editing techniques have been successfully used to improve the production and quality of livestock products, animal fertility, resistance to diseases, and welfare in animal husbandry. With legislation and the development of gene editing technology per se, it anticipatable that gene editing will have a broader utilization and make our lives happier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.