Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622803›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2018

Bronchoscopic treatment of emphysema: an update.

Camilla Poggi, Sara Mantovani, Ylenia Pecoraro, Carolina Carillo, Massimiliano Bassi, Antonio D'Andrilli, Marco Anile, Erino A Rendina, Federico Venuta, Daniele Diso

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camilla PoggiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Sara MantovaniDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Ylenia PecoraroDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Carolina CarilloDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Massimiliano BassiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Antonio D'AndrilliDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Marco AnileDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Erino A RendinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Federico VenutaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Daniele DisoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the major causes of disability and mortality. The efficacy of maximal medical treatment, although effective at the early stages of the disease, becomes limited when extensive alveolar destruction is the main cause of respiratory failure. At this stage of the disease more aggressive options, when feasible, should be considered. Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) are currently available for a selected group of patients. Endoscopic alternatives to LVRS have progressively gained acceptance and are currently employed in patients with COPD. They promote lung deflation searching the same outcome as LVRS in terms of respiratory mechanics, ameliorating the distressing symptom of chronic dyspnea by decreasing the physiological dead space.

Indexed as

coilsEmphysemalung volume reductionrespiratory failuresealantsvalvesvapour ablation

Identifiers

PMID30622803
PMCPMC6297441
OpenAlexW2898358615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.