Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622786›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018

Mutational profile of colorectal cancer lung metastases and paired primary tumors by targeted next generation sequencing: implications on clinical outcome after surgery.

Thomas Schweiger, Sandra Liebmann-Reindl, Olaf Glueck, Patrick Starlinger, Johannes Laengle, Peter Birner, Walter Klepetko, Dietmar Pils, Berthold Streubel, Konrad Hoetzenecker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Delineating the intra-patient heterogeneity of molecular alterations in treatment-naïve colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas SchweigerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra Liebmann-ReindlCore Facility Genomics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Olaf GlueckDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Patrick StarlingerDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes LaengleDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter BirnerDepartment of Pathology, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter KlepetkoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dietmar PilsDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Berthold StreubelCore Facility Genomics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Konrad HoetzeneckerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary metastasectomy is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the selection of patients who benefit from a surgical resection is difficult. Mutational profiling has become an essential part of diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. Despite this, comprehensive data on the mutational profile of CRC and its clinical impact in the context of pulmonary metastasectomy is sparse. We therefore aimed to provide a complete mutational status of CRC pulmonary metastases (PM) and corresponding primary tumors by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), and correlate sequencing data with clinical outcome variables.

methodsCase-matched, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded surgical specimens of lung metastases (n=47) and matched primary CRC (n=24) were sequenced using the TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina platform). Penalized Cox regression models were applied to identify mutations with prognostic impact.

resultsMutations were found most frequently in

conclusionsOur findings suggest that CRC PM harbor a variety of conserved and

Indexed as

colorectal cancer (CRC)exomemutationnext-generation sequencing (NGS)Pulmonary metastasis (PM)

Identifiers

PMID30622786
PMCPMC6297399
OpenAlexW2898644075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.