ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Patient and procedural features predicting early and mid-term outcome after radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative exercise training for people with non-small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Perioperative NT-proBNP in Lung Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Predictive Value, and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of nonintubated versus intubated anesthesia on postoperative pulmonary complications after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Interpret Pulmonary Function Tests and Predict Prolonged Air Leaks After Lung Resection.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-Modal Prehabilitation in Thoracic Surgery: From Basic Concepts to Practical Modalities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The ARISCAT Risk Index as a Predictor of Pulmonary Complications After Thoracic Surgeries, Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Risk Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Leading to Increased In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy for Primary Lung Cancer Resection: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study of the German Thorax Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Ventilatory efficiency slope is associated with cardiopulmonary complications after thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Review
- The association between double-lumen tube versus bronchial blocker and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after lung cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Exertional ventilation/carbon dioxide output relationship in COPD: from physiological mechanisms to clinical applications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Effect of perioperative bronchodilator therapy on postoperative pulmonary function among lung cancer patients with COPD.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Comparison of postoperative complications between segmentectomy and lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery: a multicenter study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2019Article
- Short-Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing lung resection surgery: A prospective multicenter cohort study.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative cardiovascular and pulmonary complications (PCVCs and PPCs) are frequent and result in prolonged hospital stay. The aim of this study was to update the risk factors associated with major complications and survival after lung cancer surgery.
methodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial that was designed to assess the benefits of preoperative physical training. After enrollment, clinical, biological and functional data as well as intraoperative details were collected. In-hospital PCVCs and PPCs were recorded and survival data were adjudicated up to 4 years after surgery.
resultsData from 151 patients were analyzed. Thirty-day mortality rate was 2.6% and the incidence of PCVCs and PPCs was 15% and 33%, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that, PCVCs were mainly related to elevated plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptides [odds ratios (ORs) =6.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-27.3] and performance of a pneumonectomy (OR =9.6; 95% CI, 2.9-31.5) whereas PPCs were associated with the presence of COPD (OR =5.9; 95% CI, 2.4-14.8), current smoking (OR =2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.5) and the need for blood transfusion (OR =5.2; 95% CI, 1.2-23.3). Preoperative physical training was a protective factor regarding PPCs (OR =0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.34). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that ventilatory inefficiency during exercise (expressed by a ratio >40 of ventilation to carbon dioxide elimination), coronary artery disease, elevated plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptides and the occurrence of PPCs were all predictive of poor survival after surgery.
conclusionsBesides smoking and the extent of lung resection, preexisting cardiopulmonary disease as evidence by elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptides and inefficient ventilation are associated with poor clinical outcome after lung cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.