Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622712›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections2019

Isolation of probiotic bacteria from raw camel's milk and their antagonistic effects on two bacteria causing food poisoning.

E Edalati, B Saneei, M Alizadeh, S S Hosseini, A Zahedi Bialvaei, K Taheri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role ofAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Milk production profile ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of the Probiotic Potential ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Probiotic potential of3 Biotech · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent Advances in Camel Milk Processing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E EdalatiDepartment of Microbiology, Science and Research Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran.
B SaneeiDepartment of Biology, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
M AlizadehDepartment of Microbiology, Science and Research Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran.
S S HosseiniDepartment of Biology, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
A Zahedi BialvaeiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran, Iran.
K TaheriDepartment of Biology, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
Islamic Azad University, Damghan Branch · IRIslamic Azad University Kerman · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is one of the main classes of acid-producing organisms in the food industry, and they play a vital part in many food and feed fermentations. We isolated and performed molecular identification of LAB from raw camel's milk and assessed their protective effects against pathogenicity induced by

Indexed as

Camellactic acid bacteriamilkprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID30622712
PMCPMC6317326
OpenAlexW2904635017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.