ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
The development of a decellularized extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffold derived from human foreskin for the purpose of foreskin reconstruction in circumcised males.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunogenicity and Integration of a Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Scaffold for the Reconstruction of Human Foreskin: A Preclinical Animal Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Kazald1 attenuates chondrocyte fibrosis to potentiate hyaline cartilage regeneration by interfering with the pro-fibrotic TGF-β signaling.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D bioprinting for urethral tissue reconstruction.Trends in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Decellularization techniques of human foreskin for tissue engineering application.Physiological research · 2023Article
- Decellularization of the human urethra for tissue engineering applications.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Immunohistological study of the density and distribution of human penile neural tissue: gradient hypothesis.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- Is Circumcision "Necessary" in Islam? A Philosophical Argument Based on Peer Disagreement.Journal of religion and health · 2022Article
- An Effective Method for Decellularization of Human Foreskin: Implications for Skin Regeneration in Small Wounds.Cell journal · 2022Article
- 'An insight into circumcised men seeking foreskin reconstruction: a prospective cohort study'.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
- Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and future directions.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The circumcision of males is emphatically linked to numerous sexual dysfunctions. Many of the purported benefits do not hold up to the scrutiny of extensive literature surveys. Involuntary circumcision, particularly when not medically warranted, is also associated with many psychological and emotional traumas. Current methods to reconstruct the ablated tissue have significant drawbacks and produce a simple substitute that merely imitates the natural foreskin. Extracellular matrix-based scaffolds have been shown to be highly effective in the repair and regeneration of soft tissues; however, due to the unique nature of the foreskin tissue, commercially available biomaterial scaffolds would yield poor results. Therefore, this study discusses the development and evaluation of a tissue engineering scaffold derived from decellularized human foreskin extracellular matrix for foreskin reconstruction. A chemicophysical decellularization method was applied to human foreskin samples, sourced from consenting adult donors. The resulting foreskin dermal matrices were analyzed for their suitability for tissue engineering purposes, by biological, histological, and mechanical assessment; fresh frozen foreskin was used as a negative control. Sterility of samples at all stages was ensured by microbiological analysis. MTT assay was used to evaluate the absence of viable cells, and histological analysis was used to confirm the maintenance of the extracellular matrix structure and presence/integrity of collagen fibers. Bioactivity was determined by submitting tissue extracts to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and quantifying basic fibroblast growth factor content. Mechanical properties of the samples were determined using tensile stress tests. Results found foreskin dermal matrices were devoid of viable cells (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.