Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622692›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering

The development of a decellularized extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffold derived from human foreskin for the purpose of foreskin reconstruction in circumcised males.

Valeria Purpura, Elena Bondioli, Eric J Cunningham, Giovanni De Luca, Daniela Capirossi, Evandro Nigrisoli, Tyler Drozd, Matthew Serody, Vincenzo Aiello, Davide Melandri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Decellularization of the human urethra for tissue engineering applications.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valeria PurpuraEmilia Romagna Regional Skin Bank and Burn Centre, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Elena BondioliEmilia Romagna Regional Skin Bank and Burn Centre, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Eric J CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-8594
Giovanni De LucaDepartment of Human Pathology, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Daniela CapirossiDepartment of Human Pathology, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Evandro NigrisoliDepartment of Human Pathology, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Tyler DrozdForegen Onlus Association, Rome, Italy.
Matthew SerodyForegen Onlus Association, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo AielloForegen Onlus Association, Rome, Italy.
Davide MelandriEmilia Romagna Regional Skin Bank and Burn Centre, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITAssociazione Italiana Vulvodinia Onlus · ITIllinois Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circumcision of males is emphatically linked to numerous sexual dysfunctions. Many of the purported benefits do not hold up to the scrutiny of extensive literature surveys. Involuntary circumcision, particularly when not medically warranted, is also associated with many psychological and emotional traumas. Current methods to reconstruct the ablated tissue have significant drawbacks and produce a simple substitute that merely imitates the natural foreskin. Extracellular matrix-based scaffolds have been shown to be highly effective in the repair and regeneration of soft tissues; however, due to the unique nature of the foreskin tissue, commercially available biomaterial scaffolds would yield poor results. Therefore, this study discusses the development and evaluation of a tissue engineering scaffold derived from decellularized human foreskin extracellular matrix for foreskin reconstruction. A chemicophysical decellularization method was applied to human foreskin samples, sourced from consenting adult donors. The resulting foreskin dermal matrices were analyzed for their suitability for tissue engineering purposes, by biological, histological, and mechanical assessment; fresh frozen foreskin was used as a negative control. Sterility of samples at all stages was ensured by microbiological analysis. MTT assay was used to evaluate the absence of viable cells, and histological analysis was used to confirm the maintenance of the extracellular matrix structure and presence/integrity of collagen fibers. Bioactivity was determined by submitting tissue extracts to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and quantifying basic fibroblast growth factor content. Mechanical properties of the samples were determined using tensile stress tests. Results found foreskin dermal matrices were devoid of viable cells (

Indexed as

extracellular matrixForeskin dermal matrixfresh frozen foreskin

Identifiers

PMID30622692
PMCPMC6304708
OpenAlexW2905645540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.