Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622640›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2019

Domestication of cattle: Two or three events?

Daniel Pitt, Natalia Sevane, Ezequiel L Nicolazzi, David E MacHugh, Stephen D E Park, Licia Colli, Rodrigo Martinez, Michael W Bruford, Pablo Orozco-terWengel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The chromosome-level genome of Chinese indicine cattle breed provides insights into bovine adaptation and immunity.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel PittSchool of Biosciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-2957
Natalia SevaneSchool of Biosciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-6291
Ezequiel L NicolazziParco Tecnologico Padano (PTP) Lodi Italy.
David E MacHughAnimal Genomics Laboratory UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, UCD College of Health and Agricultural Sciences University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Stephen D E ParkIdentiGEN Ltd. Dublin Ireland.
Licia ColliIstituto di Zootecnica e BioDNA Centro di Ricerca sulla Biodiversità e sul DNA Antico Università Cattolica del S. Cuore di Piacenza Piacenza Italy.
Rodrigo MartinezCorporación Colombiana De Investigación Agropecuaria (Corpoica) Centro de investigaciones Tibaitatá Bogotá Colombia.
Michael W BrufordSchool of Biosciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-6080
Pablo Orozco-terWengelSchool of Biosciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7951-4148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle have been invaluable for the transition of human society from nomadic hunter-gatherers to sedentary farming communities throughout much of Europe, Asia and Africa since the earliest domestication of cattle more than 10,000 years ago. Although current understanding of relationships among ancestral populations remains limited, domestication of cattle is thought to have occurred on two or three occasions, giving rise to the taurine (

Indexed as

approximate Bayesian computationBos indicusBos Taurusdemographic modelingdomestication historySNP array

Identifiers

PMID30622640
PMCPMC6304694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.