Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622627›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2019

Effectiveness of an anti-stigma training on improving attitudes and decreasing discrimination towards people with mental disorders among care assistant workers in Guangzhou, China.

Jie Li, Yu Fan, Hua-Qing Zhong, Xiao-Ling Duan, Wen Chen, Sara Evans-Lacko, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie Li1The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), NO. 36 Mingxin Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370 China.
Yu Fan1The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), NO. 36 Mingxin Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370 China.
Hua-Qing Zhong1The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), NO. 36 Mingxin Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370 China.
Xiao-Ling Duan1The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), NO. 36 Mingxin Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370 China.
Wen Chen2Faculty of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sara Evans-Lacko3Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Graham Thornicroft4Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1053Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare assistant workers as a new pattern of care providers in China play an important role in bridging the mental health treatment gap. Stigma and discrimination against people with mental disorders among care assistant workers is a barrier which adversely influences mental health service delivery. However, programs aimed at reducing stigma among care assistant workers are rare in China.

methodsA total of 293 care assistant workers from four districts of Guangzhou, China were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 139) and a control group (n = 154). The intervention group received anti-stigma training and the control group received traditional mental health training. Both trainings lasted for 3 h. Participants were measured before and after training using Perceived Devaluation and Discrimination Scale (PDD), Mental illness: Clinicians' Attitudes (MICA) and Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics,

resultsThere were significant lower scores on PDD and MICA in the intervention group after training when compared with the control group (both

conclusionsThese findings suggest that anti-stigma training may be effective in reducing the perception of devaluation-discrimination against people with mental illness and decreasing the level of negative stigma-related mental health attitudes among care assistant workers.

Indexed as

Care assistant workersLow-and middle-income countriesMental healthStigma and discriminationTreatment gap

Identifiers

PMID30622627
PMCPMC6317233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.