Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622616›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2018

Is the Wedged Insole an Effective Treatment Option When Compared with a Flat (Placebo) Insole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bingbing Zhang, Xing Yu, Long Liang, Liguo Zhu, Xiaopeng Dong, Yang Xiong, Quan Pan, Yongsheng Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bingbing ZhangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-5150
Xing YuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.
Long LiangWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7193-8547
Liguo ZhuWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China.
Xiaopeng DongFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Anhui 230031, China.
Yang XiongDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.
Quan PanDezhou People's Hospital, Dezhou, Shandong 253000, China.
Yongsheng SunWangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1321-4350
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNDongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNAnhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNDezhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing the lateral wedge insole is a conservative management strategy for knee osteoarthritis. The theoretical basis for this intervention is to correct femorotibial angle, thereby reducing pain and optimising function.

objectiveThis systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effectiveness of wedge insole compared with flat insole for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

methodsA systematic review was performed, searching published (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and unpublished literature from their inception to April 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of wedge insole with a flat insole were included. Risk of bias and clinical relevance were assessed, and outcomes were analysed through meta-analysis.

resultFrom a total of 413 citations, 8 studies adhered to the a priori eligibility criteria. The WOMAC pain was shown to be statistically nonsignificant change with the use of wedge insole (SMD=0.07), and low heterogeneity (I

Identifiers

PMID30622616
PMCPMC6304499
OpenAlexW2902795876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.