Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018

Within-Network Connectivity in the Salience Network After Attention Bias Modification Training in Residual Depression: Report From a Preregistered Clinical Trial.

Eva Hilland, Nils I Landrø, Catherine J Harmer, Luigi A Maglanoc, Rune Jonassen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Acute depletion of dopamine precursors in the human brain: effects on functional connectivity and alcohol attentional bias.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Phenotype Network and Brain Structural Covariance Network of Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eva HillandClinical Neuro-science Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nils I LandrøClinical Neuro-science Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Catherine J HarmerClinical Neuro-science Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Luigi A MaglanocClinical Neuro-science Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rune JonassenClinical Neuro-science Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NODiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in resting state networks (RSNs) are associated with emotional- and attentional control difficulties in depressed individuals. Attentional bias modification (ABM) training may lead to more adaptive emotional processing in depression, but little is known about the neural underpinnings associated with ABM. In the current study a sample of 134 previously depressed individuals were randomized into 14 days of computerized ABM- or a closely matched placebo training regime followed by a resting state magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Using independent component analysis (ICA) we examined within-network connectivity in three major RSN's, the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN) and the central executive network (CEN) after 2 weeks of ABM training. We found a significant difference between the training groups within the SN, but no difference within the DMN or CEN. Moreover, a significant symptom improvement was observed in the ABM group after training.

Indexed as

attention bias modification training (ABMT)central executive network (CEN)default mode network (DMN)independent component analysis (ICA)major depression (MDD)resting state functional connectivity (RSFC)salience network (SN)

Identifiers

PMID30622463
PMCPMC6308203
OpenAlexW2904420926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.