ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2019
Next-generation sequencing analysis of
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The critical role of arachidonic acid on molting in spiders.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the molecular responses of Pardosa pseudoannulata to hypoxic environments.BMC zoology · 2024Article
- Chromosome-level genome of spider Pardosa pseudoannulata and cuticle protein genes in environmental stresses.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Lampshade web spider Ectatosticta davidi chromosome-level genome assembly provides evidence for its phylogenetic position.Communications biology · 2023Article
- A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next-generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- A barcoding-based scat-analysis assessment of Eurasian otterEcology and evolution · 2021Article
- Deciphering the diet of a wandering spider (Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Compared with conventional PCR assay, qPCR assay greatly improves the detection efficiency of predation.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiders are the most common and predominant predators in terrestrial ecosystems. The predatory behavior of spiders affects the energy flow across the food web within an ecosystem. Traditiaonal methods for analyzing spider diets such as field observation, anatomy and faeces analysis are not suitable for spider experiments due to spiders' special dietary behavior. The molecular method based on the specific primers of prey DNA seems to be inefficient either in spite of its wide application in diet analysis. As the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology becomes prevalent in many different areas, several cases of the NGS-based analysis of mammal diets have been published. This study analyzed the diet differences of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.