Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622302›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2019

A great-ape view of the gut microbiome.

Alex H Nishida, Howard Ochman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human associated Archaea: a neglected microbiome worth investigating.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex H NishidaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-5847
Howard OchmanDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. howard.ochman@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

Elucidating the Evolution of Microbial Genes, Genomes and CommunitiesR35GM118038 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI OCHMAN, HOWARD · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans assemble a specialized microbiome from a world teeming with diverse microorganisms. Comparison to the microbiomes of great apes provides a dimension that is indispensable to understanding how these microbial communities form, function and change. This evolutionary perspective exposes not only how human gut microbiomes have been shaped by our great-ape heritage but also the features that make humans unique, as exemplified by an expansive loss of bacterial and archaeal diversity and the identification of microbial lineages that have co-diversified with their hosts.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic VariationAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHominidaeHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.