Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30622167›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Mild Intraocular Pressure Elevation in Mice Reveals Distinct Retinal Ganglion Cell Functional Thresholds and Pressure-Dependent Properties.

Xiaofeng Tao, Jasdeep Sabharwal, Robert L Seilheimer, Samuel M Wu, Benjamin J Frankfort

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Preferential Loss of Contrast Decrement Responses in Human Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Differential susceptibility of retinal ganglion cell subtypes against neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of purine-rich box1 on proliferation of fibroblasts.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaofeng TaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, and.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-853X
Jasdeep SabharwalDepartment of Ophthalmology, and.
Robert L SeilheimerDepartment of Ophthalmology, and.
Samuel M WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, and.
Benjamin J FrankfortDepartment of Ophthalmology, and benjamin.frankfort@bcm.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · USOphthalmology Associates (United States) · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CENTERP30EY002520 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$14.8M
PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY OF SYNAPSES IN THE RETINAR01EY004446 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WU, SAMUEL M · 1985 to 2014
$5.4M
ROD AND CONE SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN MAMMALIAN RETINAR01EY019908 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WU, SAMUEL M · 2010 to 2020
$3.8M
VISUAL SCIENCEST32EY007001 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$3.7M
Brain and eye pressure-induced optic nerve and retinal degenerationR01EY025601 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FRANKFORT, BENJAMIN J · 2015 to 2023
$3.6M
THRESHOLD AND NOISE DETERMINATIONS IN RODS AND CONESF32EY007001 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI HORNSTEIN, ERIC P · 1999 to 2001
$73k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY007001NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002520NEI NIH HHS R01 EY004446NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019908NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025601NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) causes retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dysfunction and death and is a major risk factor for glaucoma. We used a bead injection technique to increase IOP in mice of both genders by an average of ∼3 mmHg for 2 weeks. This level of IOP elevation was lower than that achieved in other studies, which allowed for the study of subtle IOP effects. We used multielectrode array recordings to determine the cellular responses of RGCs exposed to this mild degree of IOP elevation. We found that RGC photopic receptive field (RF) center size and whole-field RGC firing rates were unaffected by IOP elevation. In contrast, we found that the temporal properties of RGC photopic responses in the RF center were accelerated, particularly in ON sustained cells. We also detected a loss of antagonistic surround in several RGC subtypes. Finally, spontaneous firing rate, interspike interval variance, and contrast sensitivity were altered according to the magnitude of IOP exposure and also displayed an IOP-dependent effect. Together, these results suggest that individual RGC physiologic parameters have unique IOP-related functional thresholds that exist concurrently and change following IOP elevation according to specific patterns. Furthermore, even subtle IOP elevation can impart profound changes in RGC function, which in some cases may occur in an IOP-dependent manner. This system of overlapping functional thresholds likely underlies the complex effects of elevated IOP on the retina.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsContrast SensitivityFemaleIntraocular PressureMaleMice, Inbred C57BLRetinal Ganglion CellsVision, Ocularcellular functionglaucomaintraocular pressureIOPretinal ganglion cellRGC

Identifiers

PMID30622167
PMCPMC6407300
OpenAlexW2908817331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.