Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30621790›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2019

eToxPred: a machine learning-based approach to estimate the toxicity of drug candidates.

Limeng Pu, Misagh Naderi, Tairan Liu, Hsiao-Chun Wu, Supratik Mukhopadhyay, Michal Brylinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 main protease (3CLIn silico pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Integrated Artificial Intelligence and Physics-Based Methods for theMedicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Limeng PuDivision of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Misagh NaderiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Tairan LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Hsiao-Chun WuDivision of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Supratik MukhopadhyayDepartment of Computer Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Michal BrylinskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. michal@brylinski.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6204-2869

Funding

Combining structure-based network biology and heterogeneous computing for rational drug repositioning and polypharmacologyR35GM119524 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV A&M COL BATON ROUGE · PI BRYLINSKI, MICHAL · 2016 to 2020
$962k
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficiency of drug development defined as a number of successfully launched new pharmaceuticals normalized by financial investments has significantly declined. Nonetheless, recent advances in high-throughput experimental techniques and computational modeling promise reductions in the costs and development times required to bring new drugs to market. The prediction of toxicity of drug candidates is one of the important components of modern drug discovery.

resultsIn this work, we describe eToxPred, a new approach to reliably estimate the toxicity and synthetic accessibility of small organic compounds. eToxPred employs machine learning algorithms trained on molecular fingerprints to evaluate drug candidates. The performance is assessed against multiple datasets containing known drugs, potentially hazardous chemicals, natural products, and synthetic bioactive compounds. Encouragingly, eToxPred predicts the synthetic accessibility with the mean square error of only 4% and the toxicity with the accuracy of as high as 72%.

conclusionseToxPred can be incorporated into protocols to construct custom libraries for virtual screening in order to filter out those drug candidates that are potentially toxic or would be difficult to synthesize. It is freely available as a stand-alone software at https://github.com/pulimeng/etoxpred .

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansDeep belief networkExtremely randomized treesMachine learningSynthetic accessibilityToxicityVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID30621790
PMCPMC6325674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.