Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30621491›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2019

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of sexual intercourse for distal ureteric stones.

Bin Xu, Huilei Yan, Xuebao Zhang, Yuanshan Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bin Xu1 Department of Urology, Yantai Ye Da Hospital, Yantai, China.
Huilei Yan2 Department of Urology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Xuebao Zhang3 Department of Urology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Yuanshan Cui3 Department of Urology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Qingdao University · CNZero to Three · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of sexual intercourse for treatment of distal ureteral stones.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sexual intercourse for treatment of distal ureteral stones were searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

resultsThree RCTs comprising 240 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which showed that sexual intercourse was effective in treating distal ureteral stones. The expulsion rate of distal ureteral stones at the second week (odds ratio [OR] = 6.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.66 to 11.94), expulsion rate of distal ureteral stones at the fourth week (OR = 4.00, 95% CI: 2.09 to 7.64), and number of analgesic injections (mean difference [MD] = -0.79, 95% CI: -1.51 to -0.08) indicated that sexual intercourse was more effective than placebo. However, the mean expulsion time of distal ureteral stones (MD = -3.98, 95% CI: -8.77 to 0.81) showed no difference between sexual intercourse and placebo.

conclusionsCompared with placebo, sexual intercourse exhibited greater efficacy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones, whilst potentially alleviating pain.

Indexed as

CoitusHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUreteral Calculianalgesicsdistal ureteral stonesmeta-analysispainrandomized controlled trialsSexual intercourse

Identifiers

PMID30621491
PMCPMC6381493
OpenAlexW2908598279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.