Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30621231›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Towards an Understanding of the Molecular Basis of Nickel Hyperaccumulation in Plants.

Llewelyn van der Pas, Robert A Ingle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nickel Toxicity in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Exploratory site survey of Ni availability and accumulation inEuro-Mediterranean journal for environmental integration · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Coastal Wetland SpeciesLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Plant Resistance to Abiotic Stresses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Llewelyn van der PasDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. vpslle001@myuct.ac.za.
Robert A IngleDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. robert.ingle@uct.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal hyperaccumulation is a rare and fascinating phenomenon, whereby plants actively accumulate high concentrations of metal ions in their above-ground tissues. Enhanced uptake and root-to-shoot translocation of specific metal ions coupled with an increased capacity for detoxification and sequestration of these ions are thought to constitute the physiological basis of the hyperaccumulation phenotype. Nickel hyperaccumulators were the first to be discovered and are the most numerous, accounting for some seventy-five percent of all known hyperaccumulators. However, our understanding of the molecular basis of the physiological processes underpinning Ni hyperaccumulation has lagged behind that of Zn and Cd hyperaccumulation, in large part due to a lack of genomic resources for Ni hyperaccumulators. The advent of RNA-Seq technology, which allows both transcriptome assembly and profiling of global gene expression without the need for a reference genome, has offered a new route for the analysis of Ni hyperaccumulators, and several such studies have recently been reported. Here we review the current state of our understanding of the molecular basis of Ni hyperaccumulation in plants, with an emphasis on insights gained from recent RNA-Seq experiments, highlight commonalities and differences between Ni hyperaccumulators, and suggest potential future avenues of research in this field.

Indexed as

ferroportinhistidinehyperaccumulationIREGnickelRNA-SeqserpentineZIP

Identifiers

PMID30621231
PMCPMC6359332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.