Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30621226›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Glioblastoma's Next Top Model: Novel Culture Systems for Brain Cancer Radiotherapy Research.

Seamus Caragher, Anthony J Chalmers, Natividad Gomez-Roman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Remotely Controlled 3D-Engineered Scaffolds for Biomimetic In Vitro Investigations on Brain Cell Cocultures.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biomaterial-basedCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seamus CaragherInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK. seamuscaragher@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3839-7459
Anthony J ChalmersInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK. anthony.chalmers@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1746-7278
Natividad Gomez-RomanInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK. maria.gomez-roman@glasgow.ac.uk.
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ETM/405National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/P001335/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/P001335/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, remains one of the least treatable cancers. Current standard of care-combining surgical resection, radiation, and alkylating chemotherapy-results in a median survival of only 15 months. Despite decades of investment and research into the development of new therapies, most candidate anti-glioma compounds fail to translate into effective treatments in clinical trials. One key issue underlying this failure of therapies that work in pre-clinical models to generate meaningful improvement in human patients is the profound mismatch between drug discovery systems-cell cultures and mouse models-and the actual tumors they are supposed to imitate. Indeed, current strategies that evaluate the effects of novel treatments on GBM cells in vitro fail to account for a wide range of factors known to influence tumor growth. These include secreted factors, the brain's unique extracellular matrix, circulatory structures, the presence of non-tumor brain cells, and nutrient sources available for tumor metabolism. While mouse models provide a more realistic testing ground for potential therapies, they still fail to account for the full complexity of tumor-microenvironment interactions, as well as the role of the immune system. Based on the limitations of current models, researchers have begun to develop and implement novel culture systems that better recapitulate the complex reality of brain tumors growing in situ. A rise in the use of patient derived cells, creative combinations of added growth factors and supplements, may provide a more effective proving ground for the development of novel therapies. This review will summarize and analyze these exciting developments in 3D culturing systems. Special attention will be paid to how they enhance the design and identification of compounds that increase the efficacy of radiotherapy, a bedrock of GBM treatment.

Indexed as

3D culture systemsglioblastomagliomapre-clinical drug developmentradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30621226
PMCPMC6356812
OpenAlexW2898988908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.