ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Real-World Synthetic Biology: Is It Founded on an Engineering Approach, and Should It Be?
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A pilot oral history of plant synthetic biology.Plant physiology · 2024Review
- Development of robust constitutive synthetic promoter using genetic resources of plant pararetroviruses.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Synthetic Biology─High Time to Deliver?ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Synthetic Morphogenesis: introducing IEEE journal readers to programming living mammalian cells to make structures.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022Article
- Beyond natural: synthetic expansions of botanical form and function.The New phytologist · 2020Review
- Cell-Free Systems: A Proving Ground for Rational Biodesign.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Focus Issue Editorial: Synthetic Biology.Plant physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Authors often assert that a key feature of 21st-century synthetic biology is its use of an 'engineering approach'; design using predictive models, modular architecture, construction using well-characterized standard parts, and rigorous testing using standard metrics. This article examines whether this is, or even should be, the case. A brief survey of synthetic biology projects that have reached, or are near to, commercial application outside laboratories shows that they showed very few of these attributes. Instead, they featured much trial and error, and the use of specialized, custom components and assays. What is more, consideration of the special features of living systems suggest that a conventional engineering approach will often not be helpful. The article concludes that the engineering approach may be useful in some projects, but it should not be used to define or constrain synthetic biological endeavour, and that in fact the conventional engineering has more to gain by expanding and embracing more biological ways of working.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.