ArticlePloS one2019
Defining displacement thresholds for surgical intervention for distal radius fractures - A Delphi study.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Early Radiographic Changes Predict Radiographic Stability in Distal Radius Fractures: Development and Validation of an Explainable Predictive Model.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2027Article
- AI in Hand and Wrist Radiography: Multimodal Large Language Models for Distal Radius Fracture Detection and Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromuscular Rehabilitation of the Brachioradialis Muscle after Distal Radius Fracture in Two Professional Soccer Players Using Electromyographic Biofeedback.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Is Capitate Shift Reliable as a Single Indicator for Failure of Non-operative Management in Distal Radius Fractures?Cureus · 2023Article
- Manipulation of distal radius fractures: a comparison of Bier's block vs haematoma block.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Observational
- Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose CT compared to standard-dose CT for identification of non-displaced fractures of the shoulder, knee, ankle, and wrist.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- A comparison of early fixation of distal radius fractures versus late corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunion.ANZ journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Efficacy of electroacupuncture in assisting postoperative healing of distal radius fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Objective Outcome Measures Continue to Improve from 6 to 12 Months after Conservatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly-A Prospective Evaluation of 50 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Changing to Removable Casts During the Coronavirus Pandemic-Has It Affected Outcomes for Distal Radius Fractures?SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The theoretical impact on corrective upper limb elective services following analysis of distal radius fractures managed nonoperatively during COVID-19 pandemic.Bone & joint open · 2020Article
- The Global Burden of Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures.World journal of surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal radius fractures are very common yet controversy exists regarding which require treatment and is reflected by significant variation in surgical intervention rate. Evidence regarding which fractures would benefit from intervention is varied and largely poor quality. This study had three aims; identify which radiographic parameters are clinically important; quantify the threshold of displacement at which intervention should occur and investigate which patient factors influence the decision to intervene. A modified three round Delphi study was carried out and responses were qualitatively analysed. The Delphi panel was composed of three groups of national and international expert surgeons: hand and wrist surgeons, trauma surgeons, and international researchers. 46 participants initially agreed to take part. 43 completed the first round and all then completed three rounds. Participants were asked questions based around case vignettes in patients of three ages (38, 58, 75 years). For all age groups ulnar variance was ranked as the most important extra-articular parameter, step was ranked as the most important intra-articular parameter. Agreed thresholds were the same for all parameters for patients aged 38 and 58. Surgeons would intervene with +2 mm ulnar variance, 10 degrees dorsal tilt, 2mm step and 3mm gap. In patients aged 75 the agreed thresholds were 20 degrees dorsal tilt, 3mm step and 4mm gap, consensus was not achieved for ulnar variance. Mental capacity, pre-injury functional level and medical co-morbidities were ranked as the most important factors influencing the decision to intervene. Qualitative analysis suggested that pre-injury function was the main theme within these factors. Our findings provide useful advice about which parameters should be measured and radiographic thresholds for intervention. These thresholds may then be modified depending on important patient factors. This information can help guide clinicians with management decisions and reduce variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.