Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30620751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Antifungal activity of well-defined chito-oligosaccharide preparations against medically relevant yeasts.

Monica Ganan, Silje B Lorentzen, Jane W Agger, Catherine A Heyward, Oddmund Bakke, Svein H Knutsen, Berit B Aam, Vincent G H Eijsink, Peter Gaustad, Morten Sørlie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting Non-ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Production of Structurally Defined Chito-Oligosaccharides with a SingleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monica GananDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.
Silje B LorentzenDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.
Jane W AggerDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.
Catherine A HeywardDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Oddmund BakkeDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Svein H KnutsenNofima, Norwegian Institute of Food Fisheries & Aquaculture Research, Aas, Norway.
Berit B AamDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.
Vincent G H EijsinkDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.
Peter GaustadInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Microbiology, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Morten SørlieDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7259-6710
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Oslo · NONofima · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their antifungal activity, chitosan and its derivatives have potential to be used for treating yeast infections in humans. However, to be considered for use in human medicine, it is necessary to control and know the chemical composition of the compound, which is not always the case for polymeric chitosans. Here, we analyze the antifungal activity of a soluble and well-defined chito-oligosaccharide (CHOS) with an average polymerization degree (DPn) of 32 and fraction of acetylation (FA) of 0.15 (C32) on 52 medically relevant yeast strains. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) varied widely among yeast species, strains and isolates (from > 5000 to < 9.77 μg mL-1) and inhibition patterns showed a time- and dose-dependencies. The antifungal activity was predominantly fungicidal and was inversely proportional to the pH, being maximal at pH 4.5, the lowest tested pH. Furthermore, antifungal effects of CHOS fractions with varying average molecular weight indicated that those fractions with an intermediate degree of polymerization, i.e. DP 31 and 54, had the strongest inhibitory effects. Confocal imaging showed that C32 adsorbs to the cell surface, with subsequent cell disruption and accumulation of C32 in the cytoplasm. Thus, C32 has potential to be used as a therapy for fungal infections.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsChitosanDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular StructureMolecular WeightMycosesOligosaccharidesPolymerizationSolubilityStructure-Activity RelationshipYeastsAntifungal AgentsChitosanOligosaccharides

Identifiers

PMID30620751
PMCPMC6324834
OpenAlexW2909078263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.