Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30620333›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Contrast sensitivity reveals an oculomotor strategy for temporally encoding space.

Antonino Casile, Jonathan D Victor, Michele Rucci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation and comparison of three popular computer-based contrast sensitivity measurement techniques.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. What can the eye see with melanopsin?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Eye blinks as a visual processing stage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonino CasileCenter for Translational Neurophysiology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7824-9274
Jonathan D VictorBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-0111
Michele RucciBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-1964
Boston University · USCornell University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

CENTRAL PROCESSING OF VISUAL INFORMATIONR01EY007977 · NEI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jonathan D Victor · 1989 to 2026
$9.0M
Function of Fixational Instability During Natural ViewingR01EY018363 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RUCCI, MICHELE · 2007 to 2025
$7.8M
National Science Foundation 1420212National Science Foundation BCS-1457238NEI NIH HHS EY018363NEI NIH HHS NEI 07977NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007977NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), how sensitivity varies with the frequency of the stimulus, is a fundamental assessment of visual performance. The CSF is generally assumed to be determined by low-level sensory processes. However, the spatial sensitivities of neurons in the early visual pathways, as measured in experiments with immobilized eyes, diverge from psychophysical CSF measurements in primates. Under natural viewing conditions, as in typical psychophysical measurements, humans continually move their eyes even when looking at a fixed point. Here, we show that the resulting transformation of the spatial scene into temporal modulations on the retina constitutes a processing stage that reconciles human CSF and the response characteristics of retinal ganglion cells under a broad range of conditions. Our findings suggest a fundamental integration between perception and action: eye movements work synergistically with the spatio-temporal sensitivities of retinal neurons to encode spatial information.

Indexed as

AdultContrast SensitivityEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMotor ActivityNeuronsRetinaSpace PerceptionTime FactorsVisual PerceptionYoung Adultcomputational biologycontrast sensitivityeye movementshumanneuroscienceretinarhesus macaquesystems biologysystems modeling

Identifiers

PMID30620333
PMCPMC6324884
OpenAlexW2952728040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.