Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30620076›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2019

Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist.

M C White, K Randall, N F E Capo-Chichi, F Sodogas, S Quenum, K Wright, K L Close, S Russ, N Sevdalis, A J M Leather

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Towards sustaining a trauma quality improvement initiative in Ghana: results of a clinical trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Systematic recording and discussion of intraoperative adverse events using ClassIntra: results of a qualitative context analysis before implementation.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M C WhiteDepartment of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-1054
K RandallDepartment of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.
N F E Capo-ChichiDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Centre National Hospitalier Universitaire Hubert Koutoukou Manga, Cotonou, Benin.
F SodogasFaculté des Sciences de la Santé de Cotonou, Université d'Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
S QuenumDepartment of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.
K WrightDepartment of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.
K L CloseDepartment of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships Africa Bureau, Cotonou, Benin.
S RussCentre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, UK.
N SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, UK.
A J M LeatherCentre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improves surgical outcomes, but evidence and theoretical frameworks for successful implementation in low-income countries remain lacking. Based on previous research in Madagascar, a nationwide checklist implementation in Benin was designed and evaluated longitudinally.

methodsThis study had a longitudinal embedded mixed-methods design. The well validated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to structure the approach and evaluate the implementation. Thirty-six hospitals received 3-day multidisciplinary training and 4-month follow-up. Seventeen hospitals were sampled purposively for evaluation at 12-18 months. The primary outcome was sustainability of checklist use at 12-18 months measured by questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were CFIR-derived implementation outcomes, measured using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS), safety questionnaires and focus groups.

resultsAt 12-18 months, 86·0 per cent of participants (86 of 100) reported checklist use compared with 31·1 per cent (169 of 543) before training and 88·8 per cent (158 of 178) at 4 months. There was high-fidelity use (median WHOBARS score 5·0 of 7; use of basic safety processes ranged from 85·0 to 99·0 per cent), and high penetration shown by a significant improvement in hospital safety culture (adapted Human Factors Attitude Questionnaire scores of 76·7, 81·1 and 82·2 per cent before, and at 4 and 12-18 months after training respectively; P < 0·001). Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness and feasibility scored 9·6-9·8 of 10. This approach incorporated 31 of 36 CFIR implementation constructs successfully.

conclusionThis study shows successfully sustained nationwide checklist implementation using a validated implementation framework.

Indexed as

BeninChecklistDelivery of Health CareFollow-Up StudiesGuideline AdherenceHealth Plan ImplementationHospitalsHumansLongitudinal StudiesPatient SafetyProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID30620076
PMCPMC6519364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.