Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30619895›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2018

Systems Thinking in Practice: Participatory Modeling as a Foundation for Integrated Approaches to Health.

Raphaël Duboz, Pierre Echaubard, Panomsak Promburom, Margaret Kilvington, Helen Ross, Will Allen, John Ward, Guillaume Deffuant, Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky, Aurélie Binot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Accelerating birth equity using collaborative systems mapping.Health research policy and systems · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Bridging Knowledge Systems: A Community-Participatory Approach to EcoHealth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raphaël DubozASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Pierre EchaubardGlobal Health Asia Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panomsak PromburomCenter for Agricultural Resource System Research (CARSR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Margaret KilvingtonISREF-Independent Social Research, Evaluation & Facilitation, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Helen RossSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Will AllenLearning for Sustainability, Christchurch, New Zealand.
John WardMekong Region Futures Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Guillaume DeffuantNational Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture, Antony, France.
Michel de Garine-WichatitskyASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Aurélie BinotASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One Health (OH), EcoHealth (EH), and Planetary Health (PH) share an interest in transdisciplinary efforts that bring together scientists, citizens, government and private sectors to implement contextualized actions that promote adaptive health management across human, animal and ecosystem interfaces. A key operational element underlying these Integrated Approaches to Health (IAH) is use of Systems Thinking as a set of tools for integration. In this paper we discuss the origins and epistemology of systems thinking and argue that participatory modeling, informed by both systems theory and expertise in facilitating engagement and social learning, can help ground IAH theoretically and support its development. Participatory modeling is iterative and adaptive, which is necessary to deal with complexity in practice. Participatory modeling (PM) methods actively involve affected interests and stakeholders to ground the field of inquiry in a specific social-ecological context. Furthermore, PM processes act to reconcile the diverse understandings of the empirical world that stem from divergent discipline and community viewpoints. In this perspective article, we argue that PM can support systems thinking in practice and is essential for IAH implementation. Accordingly we invite PH, OH, and EH practitioners to systematically incorporate specialists in systems science and social engagement and facilitation. This will enable the appropriate contextualization of research practice and interventions, and ensure a balanced representation of the roles and relationships of medical, biological, mathematical, and social disciplines. For completeness, funding schemes supporting IAH need to follow the same iterative, adaptive, and participative processes to accompany IAH projects throughout their implementation.

Indexed as

EcoHealthOne Healthparticipatory modelingPlanetary Healthresiliencesustainable development goalssystems theorysystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID30619895
PMCPMC6305083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.