Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30619877›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2018

Templates of Lymph Node Dissection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Riccardo Campi, Francesco Sessa, Fabrizio Di Maida, Isabella Greco, Andrea Mari, Tána Takáčová, Andrea Cocci, Riccardo Fantechi, Alberto Lapini, Sergio Serni and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: MRI features and their association with survival.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dissecting the role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma: past, present, and future.Kidney cancer journal : official journal of the Kidney Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Riccardo CampiDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco SessaDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Fabrizio Di MaidaDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Isabella GrecoDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MariDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Tána TakáčováDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Nephrology, HELIOS Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Andrea CocciDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo FantechiDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alberto LapiniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Sergio SerniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marco CariniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MinerviniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

landmarkslymphadenectomylymph node dissectionrenal cell carcinomatemplates

Identifiers

PMID30619877
PMCPMC6306033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.