ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019
Effectiveness of a healthcare retreat for male employees with cardiovascular risk factors.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lifestyle modification is the primary treatment strategy for obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia. Recently, the Japanese government designed a healthcare retreat program for persons with cardiovascular risk factors. However, the structure and effectiveness of this program has not been fully discussed. Employees of a company group with obesity and one or more other cardiovascular risk factors were enrolled in the study. The participants in the three-day retreat program were compared with those receiving a brochure-based advice for their subsequent changes in the annual health check-up data using the propensity score matching method. Among the 415 eligible employees, 220 underwent the intensive program and 195 received a brochure-based advice. In the propensity score-matched subjects, reduction in body weight (2.7 kg vs. 0.99 kg, p < 0.01), waist circumference (3.5 cm vs. 1.5 cm, p < 0.01), and non-HDL cholesterol (8.8 mg/dl vs. 1.3 mg/dl, p = 0.05) were significantly greater in the intensive care group one year later. The superiority of the intensive program, however, was gradually attenuted for subsequent two years later. This healthcare retreat with counseling and training program would improve body weight and waist circumference for one to two subsequent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.