ArticleBiomedical optics express2018
Comparison of source localization techniques in diffuse optical tomography for fNIRS application using a realistic head model.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- CW-fDOT with a standard optical brain model: improving hemodynamic sensitivity and functional localization.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Development of a statistically standardized optical digital wrist model through integrated MRI-diffuse optical imaging methodology.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Prenatal linguistic exposure shapes language brain responses at birth.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control in Children: Evidence Using MRI and fNIRS.Brain topography · 2025Article
- High-density multidistance fNIRS enhances detection of brain activity during a word-color Stroop task.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Robust photogrammetric scalp morphology estimation for functional optical neuroimaging.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Unlocking the neural mechanisms of consumer loan evaluations: an fNIRS and ML-based consumer neuroscience study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Expressing appreciation is linked to interpersonal closeness and inter-brain coherence, both in person and over Zoom.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Virtual (Zoom) Interactions Alter Conversational Behavior and Interbrain Coherence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Impact of Anatomical Variability on Sensitivity Profile in fNIRS-MRI Integration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Unraveling neural pathways of political engagement: bridging neuromarketing and political science for understanding voter behavior and political leader perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Parallel factor analysis for multidimensional decomposition of functional near-infrared spectroscopy data.Neurophotonics · 2022Article
- Diffuse optical reconstructions of functional near infrared spectroscopy data using maximum entropy on the mean.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Diffuse Optical Tomography Using fNIRS Signals Measured from the Skull Surface of the Macaque Monkey.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a personalized functional near infra-red optical tomography workflow using maximum entropy on the mean.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Improvement of multisource localization of magnetic particles in an animal.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- High-density diffuse optical tomography for imaging human brain function.The Review of scientific instruments · 2019Article
- Measurement prediction and power analysis for fNIRS and DOT.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive imaging technique that elicits growing interest for research and clinical applications. In the last decade, efforts have been made to develop a mathematical framework in order to image the effective sources of hemoglobin variations in brain tissues. Different approaches can be used to impose additional information or constraints when reconstructing the cerebral images of an ill-posed problem. The goal of this study is to compare the performance and limitations of several source localization techniques in the context of fNIRS tomography using individual anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to model light propagation. The forward problem is solved using a Monte Carlo simulation of light propagation in the tissues. The inverse problem has been linearized using the Rytov approximation. Then, Tikhonov regularization applied to least squares, truncated singular value decomposition, back-projection, L1-norm regularization, minimum norm estimates, low resolution electromagnetic tomography and Bayesian model averaging techniques are compared using a receiver operating characteristic analysis, blurring and localization error measures. Using realistic simulations (n = 450) and data acquired from a human participant, this study depicts how these source localization techniques behave in a human head fNIRS tomography. When compared to other methods, Bayesian model averaging is proposed as a promising method in DOT and shows great potential to improve specificity, accuracy, as well as to reduce blurring and localization error even in presence of noise and deep sources. Classical reconstruction methods, such as regularized least squares, offer better sensitivity but higher blurring; while more novel L1-based method provides sparse solutions with small blurring and high specificity but lower sensitivity. The application of these methods is also demonstrated experimentally using visual fNIRS experiment with adult participant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.