ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2019
Modeling and Simulation of
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging advances to detect non-motor prodromal markers of Parkinson's disease and explore therapeutic translation opportunities.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Review
- Unveiling the molecular activity of HIV towards the CD4: A study based on subtype C via docking and dynamics approach.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- A comparative review on the well-studied GAT1 and the understudied BGT-1 in the brain.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Assessment of Paroxetine Molecular Interactions with Selected Monoamine and γ-Aminobutyric Acid Transporters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Molecular Dynamic Simulations to Probe Stereoselectivity of Tiagabine Binding with Human GAT1.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A systematic strategy for the investigation of vaccines and drugs targeting bacteria.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human γ-Aminobutyric acid transporter 1 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.